Chasing rainbows and ocean glints: Inner working angle constraints for the Habitable Worlds Observatory
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- NASA is planning for a space mission called HabWorlds to detect rocky planets in habitable zones and determine their habitability
- The presence of surface liquid water is crucial for defining planetary habitability
- The observatory will use photometric and polarimetric phase curves of starlight reflected by exoplanets to reveal optical phenomena such as ocean glint, rainbows, and scattering effects caused by clouds or atmospheric gas
- The coronagraph used in HabWorlds may obscure the phase angles where these optical features are most prominent
- Accessibility of different phase angles depends on factors like the planet's orbital inclination and the inner working angle (IWA) of the coronagraph
- A catalog of 164 stars relevant to HabWorlds was used to estimate the number of exo-Earths that could be searched for ocean glint, rainbows, and polarization effects resulting from Rayleigh scattering
- Most exo-Earth planetary systems can observe the polarimetric Rayleigh scattering peak
- Rainbows caused by water clouds at phase angles ranging from approximately 20-60 degrees would be accessible in around 46 systems with Earth equivalent instellation
- Ocean glint signature at phase angles between approximately 130-170 degrees would be observable in about 16 systems assuming an IWA of 62 milliarcseconds (mas)
- Improving the IWA to 41 mas would increase accessibility to rainbows and glints by factors of approximately 2 and 3 respectively
- Observing these scattering features can help detect surface oceans and water cycles, which are key indicators of habitability
Authors: Sophia R. Vaughan (Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford), Timothy D. Gebhard (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems), Kimberly Bott (Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside), Sarah L. Casewell (Centre for Exoplanet Research, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester), Nicolas B. Cowan (Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Department of Physics, McGill University), David S. Doelman (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Matthew Kenworthy (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Johan Mazoyer (LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris), Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer (Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara), Victor J. H. Trees (Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology), Daphne M. Stam (Delft University of Technology), Olivier Absil (STAR Institute, Université de Liège), Lisa Altinier (Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM), Pierre Baudoz (LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris), Ruslan Belikov (NASA Ames Research Center), Alexis Bidot (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG), Jayne L. Birkby (Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford), Markus J. Bonse (ETH Zurich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics), Bernhard Brandl (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Alexis Carlotti (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG), Elodie Choquet (Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM), Dirk van Dam (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Niyati Desai (Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology), Kevin Fogarty (NASA Ames Research Center), J. Fowler (Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz), Kyle van Gorkom (Steward Observatory, University of Arizona), Yann Gutierrez (LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris), Olivier Guyon (Steward Observatory, University of Arizona), Sebastiaan Y. Haffert (Steward Observatory, University of Arizona), Olivier Herscovici-Schiller (DTIS, ONERA, Université Paris Saclay), Adrien Hours (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG), Roser Juanola-Parramon (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center), Evangelia Kleisioti (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Lorenzo König (STAR Institute, Université de Liège), Maaike van Kooten (National Research Council Canada, Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Center), Mariya Krasteva (European Space Agency, ESTEC), Iva Laginja (LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris), Rico Landman (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University), Lucie Leboulleux (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG), David Mouillet (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG), Mamadou N'Diaye (Université Côte d'Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange), Emiel H. Por (Space Telescope Science Institute), Laurent Pueyo (Space Telescope Science Institute), Frans Snik (Leiden Observatory, Leiden University)
Abstract: NASA is engaged in planning for a Habitable Worlds Observatory (HabWorlds), a coronagraphic space mission to detect rocky planets in habitable zones and establish their habitability. Surface liquid water is central to the definition of planetary habitability. Photometric and polarimetric phase curves of starlight reflected by an exoplanet can reveal ocean glint, rainbows and other phenomena caused by scattering by clouds or atmospheric gas. Direct imaging missions are optimised for planets near quadrature, but HabWorlds' coronagraph may obscure the phase angles where such optical features are strongest. The range of accessible phase angles for a given exoplanet will depend on the planet's orbital inclination and/or the coronagraph's inner working angle (IWA). We use a recently-created catalog relevant to HabWorlds of 164 stars to estimate the number of exo-Earths that could be searched for ocean glint, rainbows, and polarization effects due to Rayleigh scattering. We find that the polarimetric Rayleigh scattering peak is accessible in most of the exo-Earth planetary systems. The rainbow due to water clouds at phase angles of ${\sim}20-60^\circ$ would be accessible with HabWorlds for a planet with an Earth equivalent instellation in ${\sim}{46}$ systems, while the ocean glint signature at phase angles of ${\sim}130-170^\circ$ would be accessible in ${\sim}{16}$ systems, assuming an IWA${=}62$ mas ($3\lambda/D$). Improving the IWA${=}41$ mas ($2\lambda/D$) increases accessibility to rainbows and glints by factors of approximately 2 and 3, respectively. By observing these scattering features, HabWorlds could detect a surface ocean and water cycle, key indicators of habitability.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 1
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.