Knowledge Graph Enhanced Intelligent Tutoring System Based on Exercise Representativeness and Informativeness
Authors: Linqing Li, Zhifeng Wang
Abstract: Presently, knowledge graph-based recommendation algorithms have garnered considerable attention among researchers. However, these algorithms solely consider knowledge graphs with single relationships and do not effectively model exercise-rich features, such as exercise representativeness and informativeness. Consequently, this paper proposes a framework, namely the Knowledge-Graph-Exercise Representativeness and Informativeness Framework, to address these two issues. The framework consists of four intricate components and a novel cognitive diagnosis model called the Neural Attentive cognitive diagnosis model. These components encompass the informativeness component, exercise representation component, knowledge importance component, and exercise representativeness component. The informativeness component evaluates the informational value of each question and identifies the candidate question set that exhibits the highest exercise informativeness. Furthermore, the skill embeddings are employed as input for the knowledge importance component. This component transforms a one-dimensional knowledge graph into a multi-dimensional one through four class relations and calculates skill importance weights based on novelty and popularity. Subsequently, the exercise representativeness component incorporates exercise weight knowledge coverage to select questions from the candidate question set for the tested question set. Lastly, the cognitive diagnosis model leverages exercise representation and skill importance weights to predict student performance on the test set and estimate their knowledge state. To evaluate the effectiveness of our selection strategy, extensive experiments were conducted on two publicly available educational datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our framework can recommend appropriate exercises to students, leading to improved student performance.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.