A Comparison of the Composition of Planets in Single- and Multi-Planet Systems Orbiting M dwarfs

AI-generated keywords: Exoplanetary systems M-dwarf planets Host stars Formation mechanisms Bulk densities

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study investigates and compares composition of M-dwarf planets in "singles" and "multis"
  • Analysis focuses on 70 planets (30 singles, 40 multis) across 19 systems
  • Single planets have significantly lower densities compared to multis
  • Difference in densities cannot be attributed to selection biases
  • Multis are denser than singles with a confidence level of 99%
  • Rocky multis have lower core/water mass fractions compared to singles
  • Multi-planet hosts are more metal-poor compared to single-planet hosts
  • Host star metallicity decreases with increasing planet multiplicity
  • Modest difference observed in rotation periods between single and multi-planet hosts
  • Different physical processes govern formation of single and multi-planet systems in M dwarfs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Romy Rodríguez Martínez, David V. Martin, B. Scott Gaudi, Joseph G. Schulze, Anusha Pai Asnodkar, Kiersten M. Boley, Sarah Ballard

arXiv: 2307.13034v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
20 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to ApJ and under review. Comments welcome!
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We investigate and compare the composition of M-dwarf planets in systems with only one known planet (``singles") to those residing in multi-planet systems (``multis") and the fundamental properties of their host stars. We restrict our analysis to planets with directly measured masses and radii, which comprise a total of 70 planets: 30 singles and 40 multis in 19 systems. We compare the bulk densities for the full sample, which includes planets ranging in size from $0.52 R_{\oplus}$ to $12.8R_\oplus$, and find that single planets have significantly lower densities on average than multis, which we cannot attribute to selection biases. We compare the bulk densities normalized by an Earth model for planets with $R_{p} < 6R_{\oplus}$, and find that multis are also denser with 99\% confidence. We calculate and compare the core/water mass fractions (CMF/WMF) of low-mass planets ($M_p <10 M_{\oplus}$), and find that the likely rocky multis (with $R_p <1.6 R_{\oplus}$) have lower CMFs than singles. We also compare the [Fe/H] metallicity and rotation period of all single versus multi-planet host stars with such measurements in the literature and find that multi-planet hosts are significantly more metal-poor than those hosting a single planet. Moreover, we find that host star metallicity decreases with increasing planet multiplicity. In contrast, we find only a modest difference in the rotation period. The significant differences in planetary composition and metallicity of the host stars point to different physical processes governing the formation of single- and multi-planet systems in M dwarfs.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.13034v1

In this study, the authors investigate and compare the composition of M-dwarf planets in two different types of systems: those with only one known planet (referred to as "singles") and those residing in multi-planet systems (referred to as "multis"). They also examine the fundamental properties of the host stars. The analysis is focused on planets with directly measured masses and radii, resulting in a total sample of 70 planets, including 30 singles and 40 multis across 19 systems. The authors begin by comparing the bulk densities of all planets in the sample, which range in size from $0.52 R_{\oplus}$ to $12.8R_\oplus$. They find that single planets have significantly lower densities on average compared to multis. Importantly, this difference cannot be attributed to selection biases. To further investigate this trend, the authors normalize the bulk densities by an Earth model for planets with sizes smaller than $6R_{\oplus}$. The analysis reveals that multis are also denser than singles with a confidence level of 99%. Next, they calculate and compare the core/water mass fractions (CMF/WMF) specifically for low-mass planets ($M_p <10 M_{\oplus}$). They find that rocky multis (with sizes smaller than $1.6 R_{\oplus}$) have lower CMFs compared to singles. Moving on to the properties of host stars, they examine the [Fe/H] metallicity and rotation period for both single-planet hosts and multi-planet hosts using available measurements from literature. Interestingly, they discover that multi-planet hosts are significantly more metal-poor compared to hosts with only one planet. Furthermore, there is a decrease in host star metallicity with increasing planet multiplicity observed. However, there is only a modest difference observed in rotation periods between these two groups. Overall, significant differences in planetary composition and host star metallicity suggest that different physical processes govern the formation of single-planet and multi-planet systems in M dwarfs. This study provides valuable insights into the diversity of exoplanetary systems and their underlying formation mechanisms. The authors acknowledge various sources of support for this research including grants from The Ohio State University and NASA Hubble Fellowship grant awarded by Space Telescope Science Institute among others.
Created on 07 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.