Identifying Lyα emitter candidates with Random Forest: learning from galaxies in CANDELS survey

Authors: L. Napolitano, L. Pentericci, A. Calabrò, P. Santini, M. Castellano, P. Cassata, J. P. U. Fynbo, I. Jung, D. Kashino, S. Mascia, M. Mignoli

arXiv: 2307.11818v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Accepted for publication in the 4. Extragalactic astronomy section of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 13 pages, 13 figures

Abstract: The physical processes which make a galaxy a Lyman Alpha Emitter have been extensively studied for the past 25 years. However, the correlations between physical and morphological properties of galaxies and the strength of the Ly$\alpha$ emission line are still highly debated. Therefore, we investigate the correlations between the rest-frame Ly$\alpha$ equivalent width and stellar mass, star formation rate, dust reddening, metallicity, age, half-light semi-major axis, S\'ersic index and projected axis ratio in a sample of 1578 galaxies in the redshift range $2 \leq z \leq 7.9$ from the GOODS-S, UDS and COSMOS fields. From the large sample of Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) in the dataset we find that LAEs are typically common main sequence star forming galaxies which show stellar mass $ \leq 10^9 \text{M}_{\odot}$, star formation rate $ \leq 10^{0.5} \text{M}_{\odot}/\text{yr}$, $E(B-V) \leq 0.2$ and half-light semi-major axis $\leq 1 \text{kpc}$. Building on these findings we develop a new method based on Random Forest (i.e. a Machine Learning classifier) in order to select galaxies which have the highest probability of being Ly$\alpha$ emitters. When applied to a population in the redshift range $z \in [2.5, 4.5]$, our classifier holds a $(80 \pm 2)\%$ accuracy and $(73 \pm 4)\%$ precision. At higher redshifts ($z \in [4.5, 6]$), we obtain a $73\%$ accuracy and a $80\%$ precision. These results highlight it is possible to overcome the current limitations in assembling large samples of LAEs by making informed predictions that can be used for planning future large scale spectroscopic surveys.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.11818v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 27 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.