Zooming in on the circumgalactic medium: resolving small-scale gas structure with the GIBLE cosmological simulations
Authors: Rahul Ramesh, Dylan Nelson
Abstract: We introduce Project GIBLE (Gas Is Better resoLved around galaxiEs), a suite of cosmological zoom-in simulations where gas in the circumgalactic medium (CGM) is preferentially simulated at ultra-high numerical resolution. Our initial sample consists of eight galaxies, all selected as Milky Way-like galaxies at $z=0$ from the TNG50 simulation. Using the same galaxy formation model as IllustrisTNG, and the moving-mesh code AREPO, we re-simulate each of these eight galaxies maintaining a resolution equivalent to TNG50-2 ($m_{\rm{gas}}$ $\sim$ $8 \times 10^5 {\rm M}_{\odot}$). However, we use our super-Lagrangian refinement scheme to more finely resolve gas in the CGM around these galaxies. Our highest resolution runs achieve 512 times better mass resolution ($\sim$ $10^3 {\rm M}_{\odot}$). This corresponds to a median spatial resolution of $\sim$ $75$ pc at $0.15~R_{\rm{200,c}}$, which coarsens with increasing distance to $\sim$ $700$ pc at the virial radius. We make predictions for the covering fractions of several observational tracers of multi-phase CGM gas: HI, MgII, CIV and OVII. We then study the impact of improved resolution on small scale structure. While the abundance of the smallest cold, dense gas clouds continues to increase with improving resolution, the number of massive clouds is well converged. We conclude by quantifying small scale structure with the velocity structure function and the auto-correlation function of the density field, assessing their resolution dependence. The GIBLE cosmological hydrodynamical simulations enable us to improve resolution in a computationally efficient manner, thereby achieving numerical convergence of a subset of key CGM gas properties and observables.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.