On the (In)Effectiveness of Large Language Models for Chinese Text Correction

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models ChatGPT Chinese Text Correction CGEC CSC

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen significant development and progress in the Artificial Intelligence community.
  • ChatGPT is a prominent representative of LLMs and has sparked extensive research on its capabilities and performance in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.
  • ChatGPT exhibits exceptional multilingual processing abilities, including Chinese.
  • This study focuses on ChatGPT's performance in Chinese Text Correction, specifically Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) and Chinese Spelling Check (CSC).
  • The researchers find that while ChatGPT shows impressive performance in certain aspects of Chinese Text Correction, it also exhibits unsatisfactory behavior in other areas.
  • These findings have implications for the application of LLMs in the Chinese NLP community.
  • The research aims to facilitate the practical implementation and utilization of LLMs for text correction in Chinese.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yinghui Li, Haojing Huang, Shirong Ma, Yong Jiang, Yangning Li, Feng Zhou, Hai-Tao Zheng, Qingyu Zhou

Work in progress!

Abstract: Recently, the development and progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) have amazed the entire Artificial Intelligence community. As an outstanding representative of LLMs and the foundation model that set off this wave of research on LLMs, ChatGPT has attracted more and more researchers to study its capabilities and performance on various downstream Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. While marveling at ChatGPT's incredible performance on kinds of tasks, we notice that ChatGPT also has excellent multilingual processing capabilities, such as Chinese. To explore the Chinese processing ability of ChatGPT, we focus on Chinese Text Correction, a fundamental and challenging Chinese NLP task. Specifically, we evaluate ChatGPT on the Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) and Chinese Spelling Check (CSC) tasks, which are two main Chinese Text Correction scenarios. From extensive analyses and comparisons with previous state-of-the-art fine-tuned models, we empirically find that the ChatGPT currently has both amazing performance and unsatisfactory behavior for Chinese Text Correction. We believe our findings will promote the landing and application of LLMs in the Chinese NLP community.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.09007v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recently, there has been significant development and progress in Large Language Models (LLMs), which has captivated the Artificial Intelligence community. One such model, ChatGPT, has emerged as a prominent representative of LLMs and has sparked extensive research on its capabilities and performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. While ChatGPT has demonstrated remarkable performance on diverse tasks, it also exhibits exceptional multilingual processing abilities, including Chinese. To delve into ChatGPT's Chinese processing capabilities, this study focuses on Chinese Text Correction—a fundamental and challenging NLP task. Specifically, the researchers evaluate ChatGPT's performance on two main scenarios of Chinese Text Correction: Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) and Chinese Spelling Check (CSC). Through extensive analysis and comparisons with previous state-of-the-art fine-tuned models, the researchers empirically find that while ChatGPT showcases impressive performance in certain aspects of Chinese Text Correction, it also exhibits unsatisfactory behavior in other areas. These findings hold significant implications for the application of LLMs in the Chinese NLP community. By shedding light on both the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT in handling Chinese Text Correction tasks, this research aims to facilitate the practical implementation and utilization of LLMs within the context of Chinese language processing. The authors' work represents an ongoing effort to explore and enhance the effectiveness of large language models for improving text correction in Chinese.
Created on 27 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.