Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts

AI-generated keywords: Language Model Long Contexts Multi-document QA Key-Value Retrieval Evaluation Protocols

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Language models' ability to process extensive input contexts is explored
  • Performance of language models on multi-document question answering and key-value retrieval tasks is analyzed
  • Language model performance is highest when relevant information is at the beginning or end of the input context
  • Significant degradation occurs when models need to access relevant information in the middle of long contexts
  • Even explicitly long-context models experience a decrease in performance as input context grows longer
  • The analysis provides insights into how language models utilize their input context
  • New evaluation protocols for future long-context models are introduced
  • The work contributes to understanding language model behavior and can guide advancements in natural language processing research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nelson F. Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, Percy Liang

19 pages, 18 figures

Abstract: While recent language models have the ability to take long contexts as input, relatively little is known about how well they use longer context. We analyze language model performance on two tasks that require identifying relevant information within their input contexts: multi-document question answering and key-value retrieval. We find that performance is often highest when relevant information occurs at the beginning or end of the input context, and significantly degrades when models must access relevant information in the middle of long contexts. Furthermore, performance substantially decreases as the input context grows longer, even for explicitly long-context models. Our analysis provides a better understanding of how language models use their input context and provides new evaluation protocols for future long-context models.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.03172v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts" by Nelson F. Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni and Percy Liang explores how well language models utilize long contexts. Recent language models have the capability to process extensive input contexts but there is limited understanding of their effectiveness when doing so. The authors analyze the performance of these models on two tasks: multi-document question answering and key-value retrieval which require identifying relevant information within the input context. The findings reveal that language model performance is highest when relevant information is located at the beginning or end of the input context. However, a significant degradation occurs when models need to access relevant information in the middle of long contexts. Additionally, as the input context grows longer even explicitly long-context models experience a substantial decrease in performance. This analysis provides valuable insights into how language models utilize their input context and introduces new evaluation protocols for future long-context models. The authors' work contributes to a better understanding of language model behavior and can guide further advancements in natural language processing research.
Created on 15 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.