Roman CCS White Paper: Characterizing the Galactic population of isolated black holes

AI-generated keywords: Isolated Black Holes Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey Roman's Astrometric Potential Ground-Based Facilities Supermassive Black Holes

AI-generated Key Points

  • Existing summary highlights uncertainty surrounding properties of isolated black holes (BHs) in the Milky Way
  • Estimated 100 million BHs in our galaxy, but only one discovered so far
  • Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey offers opportunity to expand BH catalog by orders of magnitude
  • Crucial to realize Roman's astrometric potential for accurate measurements and identification of BH candidates
  • Minimize observational gaps in Bulge region, expected to host significant number of BHs
  • Ground-based facilities can fill observational gaps during non-Bulge seasons with targeted observations
  • Expanding catalog of isolated BHs has implications for massive stellar evolution, gravitational wave sources, supernova physics, and growth mechanisms of supermassive black holes
  • Leveraging Roman's capabilities and combining with ground-based observations can significantly expand understanding of isolated black holes in the Milky Way
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Casey Y. Lam (UC Berkeley), Natasha Abrams (UC Berkeley), Jeff Andrews (University of Florida), Etienne Bachelet (IPAC), Arash Bahramian (Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy), David Bennett (NASA Goddard, UMd College Park), Valerio Bozza (Salerno University), Floor Broekgaarden (CfA | Harvard & Smithsonian), Sukanya Chakrabarti (University of Alabama, Huntsville), William Dawson (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Kareem El-Badry (Harvard), Maya Fishbach (CITA, University of Toronto), Giacomo Fragione (CIERA, Northwestern), Scott Gaudi (The Ohio State University), Abhimat Gautam (UCLA), Ryosuke Hirai (Monash University), Daniel Holz (University of Chicago), Matthew Hosek Jr. (UCLA), Macy Huston (Penn State), Tharindu Jayasinghe (UC Berkeley), Samson Johnson (NASA JPL), Daisuke Kawata (University College London), Naoki Koshimoto (Osaka University), Jessica R. Lu (UC Berkeley), Ilya Mandel (Monash University), Shota Miyazaki (JAXA/ISAS), Przemek Mróz (University of Warsaw), Smadar Naoz (UCLA), Clément Ranc (IAP, Sorbonne University), Dominick Rowan (The Ohio State University), Rainer Schödel (IAA-CSIC, Granada, Spain), Tomer Shenar (University of Amsterdam), Josh Simon (Carnegie Observatories), Rachel Street (Las Cumbres Observatory), Takahiro Sumi (Osaka University), Daisuke Suzuki (Osaka University), Sean Terry (UC Berkeley)

arXiv: 2306.12514v2 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
20 pages. Submitted in response to Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope white paper call: https://roman.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/ccs_white_papers.html. v2 fixes a typo in Figure 5 axis label (days --> year)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Although there are estimated to be 100 million isolated black holes (BHs) in the Milky Way, only one has been found so far, resulting in significant uncertainty about their properties. The Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey provides the only opportunity in the coming decades to grow this catalog by order(s) of magnitude. This can be achieved if 1) Roman's astrometric potential is fully realized in the observation strategy and software pipelines, 2) Roman's observational gaps of the Bulge are minimized, and 3) observations with ground-based facilities are taken of the Bulge to fill in gaps during non-Bulge seasons. A large sample of isolated BHs will enable a broad range of astrophysical questions to be answered, such as massive stellar evolution, origin of gravitational wave sources, supernova physics, and the growth of supermassive BHs, maximizing Roman's scientific return.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.12514v2

The existing summary highlights the significant uncertainty surrounding the properties of isolated black holes (BHs) in the Milky Way. While there are estimated to be 100 million BHs in our galaxy, only one has been discovered so far. To address this knowledge gap, the Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey offers a unique opportunity to expand the catalog of BHs by orders of magnitude in the coming decades. To achieve this goal, several key factors need to be considered. First, it is crucial to fully realize Roman's astrometric potential in both observation strategy and software pipelines. This will enable more accurate measurements and identification of BH candidates. Additionally, efforts should be made to minimize observational gaps of the Bulge region which is expected to host a significant number of BHs. Furthermore, ground-based facilities can play a vital role in filling in observational gaps during non-Bulge seasons by conducting targeted observations of the Bulge. Expanding the catalog of isolated BHs will have far-reaching implications for various areas of astrophysics; providing valuable insights into massive stellar evolution, shedding light on the origins of gravitational wave sources, enhancing our understanding of supernova physics and contributing to our knowledge about the growth mechanisms of supermassive black holes. In conclusion, by leveraging Roman's capabilities and combining them with ground-based observations scientists have an unprecedented opportunity to significantly expand our understanding of isolated black holes in the Milky Way; unlocking new avenues for exploring fundamental questions in astrophysics.
Created on 01 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.