Harnessing the Power of Adversarial Prompting and Large Language Models for Robust Hypothesis Generation in Astronomy

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in Astronomy
  • In-context prompting with NASA Astrophysics Data System papers improves GPT-4's performance in hypothesis generation
  • Adversarial prompting further enhances GPT-4's ability to extract crucial details and generate meaningful hypotheses
  • Astro-GPT workflow involves pre-processing 1000 papers from Galactic Astronomy corpus using langchain library
  • Retrieval phase includes similarity search and contextual compression to filter out irrelevant information
  • Adversarial experiment designed involving secondary GPT-4 model for critiquing and enhancing generated ideas
  • Results show significant improvement in hypothesis quality with adversarial prompting and domain-specific context enrichment
  • Experimental setup includes different numbers of papers for hypothesis generation and replication cycles
  • Exploration of embeddings and their impact on hypothesis generation is included in the study (results in appendix)
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ioana Ciucă, Yuan-Sen Ting, Sandor Kruk, Kartheik Iyer

arXiv: 2306.11648v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
8 pages, 3 figures, accepted to ICML ML4Astro Workshop. Comments and suggestions are welcome
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This study investigates the application of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, within Astronomy. We employ in-context prompting, supplying the model with up to 1000 papers from the NASA Astrophysics Data System, to explore the extent to which performance can be improved by immersing the model in domain-specific literature. Our findings point towards a substantial boost in hypothesis generation when using in-context prompting, a benefit that is further accentuated by adversarial prompting. We illustrate how adversarial prompting empowers GPT-4 to extract essential details from a vast knowledge base to produce meaningful hypotheses, signaling an innovative step towards employing LLMs for scientific research in Astronomy.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.11648v1

, , , , : This study explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the field of Astronomy. The researchers utilize in-context prompting by supplying GPT-4 with up to 1000 papers from the NASA Astrophysics Data System to investigate how immersing the model in domain-specific literature can improve its performance. The findings indicate a significant enhancement in hypothesis generation when using in-context prompting, and this benefit is further amplified by adversarial prompting. The researchers demonstrate how adversarial prompting empowers GPT-4 to extract crucial details from a vast knowledge base and generate meaningful hypotheses, representing a groundbreaking advancement in utilizing LLMs for scientific research in Astronomy. The study employs an Astro-GPT workflow that involves pre-processing 1000 papers from the Galactic Astronomy corpus using the langchain library. These papers are transformed from PDF to text and segmented into chunks of 1000 tokens each. OpenAI's text-ada-002 embedding model is used to embed these segmented units. The retrieval phase begins with converting chat history and input queries into standalone inputs, which are then embedded. A similarity search is conducted between the embedded query and a vector database. Langchain's contextual compression is utilized to filter out irrelevant information from individual chunks, resulting in final texts that, along with standalone inputs, serve as the foundation for hypothesis formulation by GPT-4. To evaluate the model's capabilities, an adversarial experiment is designed involving a secondary GPT-4 model that critiques generated ideas and suggests potential enhancements. This feedback is reformulated within a feedback-question structure by a third GPT-4 instance and returned to the initial model. The study presents results based on human evaluation of hypotheses and critiques generated by AI models. Adversarial prompting and domain-specific context enrichment significantly enhance the quality of hypothesis generation. The effectiveness of adversarial prompting becomes evident when an extensive context of 1000 papers is provided, leading to substantial improvements in both the quality and consistency of AI judge and AI generator outputs. The experimental setup involves using different numbers of papers (Nk, where k ∈ {1, 10, 100, 1000}) for hypothesis generation by the in-context prompted model. An adversarial response follows from an Adversarial GPT-4 model, which is then reformulated by a moderator GPT-4 instance and fed back to the generator model. This cycle is repeated twice for each Nk and replicated five times in total. The same approach is applied to 1000 papers without resampling, resulting in a total of 60 hypotheses and 40 critiques. The study also includes exploration of embeddings and their impact on hypothesis generation; results are presented in the appendix.
Created on 23 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.