AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkers

AI-generated keywords: Human-robot interaction Large language models Task-and-motion planning Few-shot translation AutoTAMP

AI-generated Key Points

  • Robots' ability to comprehend, strategize, and carry out intricate, long-term tasks articulated in natural language is crucial for effective human-robot interaction.
  • Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) show promise in translating natural language into sequences of actions for robots to execute complex tasks.
  • A new approach involves few-shot translation from natural language task descriptions to an intermediary task representation, which can be utilized by a traditional task-and-motion planning (TAMP) algorithm to collaboratively solve both the task and motion plan.
  • Automatic detection and correction of syntactic and semantic errors through autoregressive re-prompting enhance the translation process and result in notable enhancements in task completion rates.
  • The newly proposed method showcased significant superiority over existing methods that employ LLMs as planners in navigating complex task domains.
  • Challenges persist when dealing with complexities such as temporally-dependent multi-step actions, action sequence optimization, and task constraints despite efforts made towards enhancing executability through feedback mechanisms and verifying sub-task sequences' executability within the framework.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yongchao Chen, Jacob Arkin, Yang Zhang, Nicholas Roy, Chuchu Fan

18 pages, 8 figures
License: CC ZERO 1.0

Abstract: For effective human-robot interaction, robots need to understand, plan, and execute complex, long-horizon tasks described by natural language. The recent and remarkable advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for translating natural language into robot action sequences for complex tasks. However, many existing approaches either translate the natural language directly into robot trajectories, or factor the inference process by decomposing language into task sub-goals, then relying on a motion planner to execute each sub-goal. When complex environmental and temporal constraints are involved, inference over planning tasks must be performed jointly with motion plans using traditional task-and-motion planning (TAMP) algorithms, making such factorization untenable. Rather than using LLMs to directly plan task sub-goals, we instead perform few-shot translation from natural language task descriptions to an intermediary task representation that can then be consumed by a TAMP algorithm to jointly solve the task and motion plan. To improve translation, we automatically detect and correct both syntactic and semantic errors via autoregressive re-prompting, resulting in significant improvements in task completion. We show that our approach outperforms several methods using LLMs as planners in complex task domains.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.06531v1

In the realm of effective human-robot interaction, the ability of robots to comprehend, strategize, and carry out intricate, long-term tasks articulated in natural language is crucial. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in translating natural language into sequences of actions for robots to execute complex tasks. However, existing approaches often either directly translate natural language into robot trajectories or break down the inference process by segmenting language into task sub-goals and relying on a motion planner to execute each sub-goal. When faced with complex environmental and temporal constraints, the joint performance of inference over planning tasks alongside motion plans using traditional task-and-motion planning (TAMP) algorithms becomes necessary, rendering such factorization impractical. Rather than utilizing LLMs to directly plan task sub-goals, a new approach has emerged that involves few-shot translation from natural language task descriptions to an intermediary task representation. This intermediary representation can then be utilized by a TAMP algorithm to collaboratively solve both the task and motion plan. To enhance the translation process, automatic detection and correction of syntactic and semantic errors are implemented through autoregressive re-prompting, resulting in notable enhancements in task completion rates. The newly proposed method showcased significant superiority over several existing methods that employ LLMs as planners in navigating complex task domains. Additionally, efforts have been made towards addressing issues related to feedback mechanisms and verifying the executability of sub-task sequences within this framework. Despite previous research focusing on enhancing executability through connecting sub-tasks to control policy affordance functions or providing environmental feedback on robot actions, challenges persist when dealing with various complexities such as temporally-dependent multi-step actions, action sequence optimization, and task constraints. Furthermore, existing frameworks tend to segregate the planning problem by inferring a task plan separately from the motion plan using LLMs. This separation poses limitations when handling intricate tasks that require seamless integration between planning and execution processes. The continuous evolution and refinement of methodologies like AutoTAMP hold promise for advancing human-robot interaction capabilities by enabling robots to effectively interpret natural language instructions for executing complex tasks with precision and efficiency.
Created on 04 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.