JADES: Detecting [OIII]$λ4363$ Emitters and Testing Strong Line Calibrations in the High-$z$ Universe with Ultra-deep JWST/NIRSpec Spectroscopy up to $z \sim 9.5$
AI-generated Key Points
- 10 new detections of the [OIII]$\lambda 4363$ auroral line up to a redshift of $z\sim 9.5$
- Ultra-deep spectroscopic observations using JWST/NIRSpec MSA instrument as part of JADES
- Determination of electron temperatures and oxygen abundances using direct T$_e$ method
- Comparison of results against locally calibrated strong-line diagnostics and high-redshift calibrations
- Calibrations fail to match JADES sample, indicating need for revision at high redshifts
- Ineffectiveness of certain line-ratios (R2 and O3O2) as metallicity diagnostics at high redshifts
- Tentative flattening in other strong-line ratios (R3 and R23) used as metallicity indicators in local galaxies
- Proposal and testing of alternative diagnostic based on different combination of R3 and R2 with higher dynamic range
- Higher ionization/excitation ratios in their galaxies compared to local galaxies
- Median rest-frame EWs(H$\beta$) about two times less than those used for local calibrations
- Discrepancy in EW combined with high ionization raises questions about production of [OIII]$\lambda 4363$
- Novel detections providing insights into metallicity diagnostics at high redshifts
- Findings warrant revision of existing calibrations and development of new diagnostic tools
Authors: Isaac H. Laseter, Michael V. Maseda, Mirko Curti, Roberto Maiolino, Francesco D'Eugenio, Alex J. Cameron, Tobias J. Looser, Santiago Arribas, William M. Baker, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Kristan Boyett, Andrew J. Bunker, Stefano Carniani, Stephane Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, Emma Curtis-lake, Eiichi Egami, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Kevin Hainline, Ryan Hausen, Zhiyuan Ji, Nimisha Kumari, Michele Perna, Tim Rawle, Hans-Walter Rix, Brant Robertson, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Lester Sandles, Jan Scholtz, Renske Smit, Sandro Tacchella, Hannah Übler, Christina C. Williams, Chris Willott, Joris Witstok
Abstract: We present 10 novel [OIII]$\lambda 4363$ auroral line detections up to $z\sim 9.5$ measured from ultra-deep JWST/NIRSpec MSA spectroscopy from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES). We leverage the deepest spectroscopic observations yet taken with NIRSpec to determine electron temperatures and oxygen abundances using the direct T$_e$ method. We directly compare against a suite of locally calibrated strong-line diagnostics and recent high-$z$ calibrations. We find the calibrations fail to simultaneously match our JADES sample, thus warranting a self-consistent revision of these calibrations for the high-$z$ Universe. We find weak dependence between R2 and O3O2 with metallicity, thus suggesting these line-ratios are ineffective in the high-$z$ Universe as metallicity diagnostics and degeneracy breakers. We find R3 and R23 still correlate with metallicity, but we find tentative flattening of these diagnostics, thus suggesting future difficulties when applying these strong-line ratios as metallicity indicators in the high-$z$ Universe. We also propose and test an alternative diagnostic based on a different combination of R3 and R2 with a higher dynamic range. We find a reasonably good agreement (median offset of 0.002 dex, median absolute offset of 0.13 dex) with the JWST sample at low metallicity. Our sample demonstrates higher ionization/excitation ratios than local galaxies with rest-frame EWs(H$\beta$) $\approx 200 -300$ Angstroms. However, we find the median rest-frame EWs(H$\beta$) of our sample to be $\sim 2\text{x}$ less than the galaxies used for the local calibrations. This EW discrepancy combined with the high ionization of our galaxies does not present a clear description of [OIII]$\lambda 4363$ production in the high-$z$ Universe, thus warranting a much deeper examination into the factors affecting production.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.