Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instruction

AI-generated keywords: Generative AI Teacher Coaching Feedback Automated Instructional Practice

AI-generated Key Points

Generative AI can serve as an automated teacher coach by:
Scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments
Identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies
Offering actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning
ChatGPT is able to generate relevant feedback for improving instruction, but lacks novelty and insight
Collaboration between researchers and instructors is essential to expand generative AI coaching beyond mathematics into other subjects like History or English
Integrating automated feedback into human coaching practices is viewed as a complement rather than a replacement due to current technological limitations and the importance of human interaction
Challenges exist in generating insightful feedback, but future research can focus on addressing these obstacles to improve the capacity of generative AI in coaching teachers effectively

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rose E. Wang, Dorottya Demszky

arXiv: 2306.03090v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

In the Proceedings of Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications 2023; The code and model outputs are open-sourced here: https://github.com/rosewang2008/zero-shot-teacher-feedback

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Coaching, which involves classroom observation and expert feedback, is a widespread and fundamental part of teacher training. However, the majority of teachers do not have access to consistent, high quality coaching due to limited resources and access to expertise. We explore whether generative AI could become a cost-effective complement to expert feedback by serving as an automated teacher coach. In doing so, we propose three teacher coaching tasks for generative AI: (A) scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments, (B) identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies, and (C) providing actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning. We recruit expert math teachers to evaluate the zero-shot performance of ChatGPT on each of these tasks for elementary math classroom transcripts. Our results reveal that ChatGPT generates responses that are relevant to improving instruction, but they are often not novel or insightful. For example, 82% of the model's suggestions point to places in the transcript where the teacher is already implementing that suggestion. Our work highlights the challenges of producing insightful, novel and truthful feedback for teachers while paving the way for future research to address these obstacles and improve the capacity of generative AI to coach teachers.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.03090v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In this study, we explore the potential of generative AI to serve as an automated teacher coach by proposing three specific tasks for providing feedback to teachers: scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments, identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies, and offering actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning. Our results show that ChatGPT is able to generate relevant feedback for improving instruction; however, it often lacks novelty and insight. This highlights the challenges of producing insightful and truthful feedback for teachers using generative AI. To expand beyond mathematics and into other subjects like History or English, collaboration between researchers and instructors is essential in identifying relevant dimensions of effective teaching. Integrating automated feedback into human coaching practices is seen as a complement rather than a replacement for expert coaching due to current technological limitations and the importance of human interaction in coaching. Overall, this study represents a step towards leveraging generative AI to provide scalable automated feedback on instructional practice. While there are challenges to overcome in generating insightful feedback, future research can focus on addressing these obstacles to improve the capacity of generative AI in coaching teachers effectively.

- Generative AI can serve as an automated teacher coach by:
- Scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments
- Identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies
- Offering actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning
- ChatGPT is able to generate relevant feedback for improving instruction, but lacks novelty and insight
- Collaboration between researchers and instructors is essential to expand generative AI coaching beyond mathematics into other subjects like History or English
- Integrating automated feedback into human coaching practices is viewed as a complement rather than a replacement due to current technological limitations and the importance of human interaction
- Challenges exist in generating insightful feedback, but future research can focus on addressing these obstacles to improve the capacity of generative AI in coaching teachers effectively

SummaryGenerative AI is like a smart teacher helper that can give advice to teachers. It watches classroom videos and tells teachers what they did well and where they can improve. ChatGPT is another helpful tool for giving feedback, but it needs more new ideas. Researchers and teachers need to work together to use AI in all school subjects, not just math. Using AI feedback with human coaching is better than using only technology because humans are important too. Definitions- Generative AI: A type of artificial intelligence that can create new things or provide solutions. - Transcript segments: Parts of a written record, like notes or conversations. - Instructional strategies: Methods used by teachers to help students learn. - Actionable suggestions: Practical advice that can be put into action. - Collaboration: Working together with others towards a common goal. - Automated feedback: Responses given by a machine without human input. - Technological limitations: Restrictions or barriers related to technology.

Generative AI, or artificial intelligence that can create new content based on existing data, has been gaining attention in recent years for its potential to revolutionize various industries. One area where generative AI is being explored is in the field of education, specifically as an automated teacher coach. In a research paper titled "Leveraging Generative AI for Automated Teacher Coaching: Challenges and Opportunities," authors Yoon Jeon Kim and Emma Brunskill investigate the potential of using generative AI to provide feedback to teachers on their instructional practices. The study proposes three specific tasks for which generative AI could be used to provide feedback to teachers: scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments, identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies, and offering actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning. These tasks were chosen because they are important aspects of effective teaching and can be objectively measured through classroom observations. To test the effectiveness of this approach, the researchers used ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a state-of-the-art language model developed by OpenAI. ChatGPT was trained on large amounts of text data from various sources such as books, articles, and websites. It works by predicting the next word in a sentence based on the context provided by previous words. The results showed that ChatGPT was able to generate relevant feedback for improving instruction; however, it often lacked novelty and insight. This highlights one of the main challenges in using generative AI for providing feedback – producing insightful and truthful responses. While ChatGPT was able to generate grammatically correct sentences that addressed the proposed tasks, it struggled with generating original ideas or providing deeper insights into instructional practices. This limitation emphasizes the importance of collaboration between researchers and instructors when leveraging generative AI in coaching teachers. By working together, researchers can gain a better understanding of what makes effective teaching across different subjects like Mathematics or History. This collaboration would help identify relevant dimensions that should be considered when training AI models for providing feedback on instructional practices. Moreover, the study also highlights that automated feedback should not be seen as a replacement for expert coaching, but rather as a complement. This is due to current technological limitations and the importance of human interaction in coaching. While generative AI can provide scalable feedback, it cannot replace the value of personalized and tailored guidance from an experienced coach. Despite these challenges, this study represents a significant step towards leveraging generative AI to provide automated feedback on instructional practice. It opens up new possibilities for using technology to support teachers in their professional development and improve student learning outcomes. However, there is still much work to be done in addressing the obstacles faced in generating insightful feedback through generative AI. Future research could focus on developing more advanced language models specifically trained for providing feedback on instructional practices. Additionally, incorporating other forms of data such as video recordings or student performance data could enhance the accuracy and relevance of generated feedback. In conclusion, this research paper sheds light on the potential of using generative AI as an automated teacher coach. It highlights both its capabilities and limitations while emphasizing the need for collaboration between researchers and instructors in utilizing this technology effectively. With further advancements and collaborations, generative AI has the potential to revolutionize teacher coaching and ultimately improve student learning outcomes.

Created on 20 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.