Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.00381v1

, , , , The paper "Better Context Makes Better Code Language Models: A Case Study on Function Call Argument Completion" by Hengzhi Pei, Jinman Zhao, Leonard Lausen, Sheng Zha, and George Karypis explores the limitations of existing code completion models in considering non-local context when predicting function call arguments. The authors introduce a new dataset comprising permissively licensed Python packages with complete projects and dependencies to address this gap. By leveraging program analyzers, they extract non-local information essential for accurate function call argument completion. The focus of the study is on predicting arguments for function calls, a task where traditional code completion models fall short. The authors demonstrate that querying a program analyzer for relevant information related to a specific function call significantly enhances argument completion performance. By incorporating details such as function implementation and usage patterns during both training and inference stages, the proposed approach outperforms existing models. Through experiments and an ablation study, the authors provide insights into how different types of information obtained from program analyzers impact model performance. They highlight the importance of considering various sources of data to improve accuracy in completing function call arguments. The findings underscore the significance of incorporating broader contextual information beyond local file contexts in enhancing code language models for efficient program synthesis. This research contributes valuable knowledge towards refining code completion systems by emphasizing the critical role of comprehensive context in achieving better model performance.

• - Existing code completion models have limitations in considering non-local context when predicting function call arguments
• - Introduction of a new dataset comprising permissively licensed Python packages with complete projects and dependencies to address this gap
• - Leveraging program analyzers to extract non-local information essential for accurate function call argument completion
• - Querying a program analyzer for relevant information related to a specific function call significantly enhances argument completion performance
• - Incorporating details such as function implementation and usage patterns during both training and inference stages outperforms existing models
• - Importance of considering various sources of data from program analyzers to improve accuracy in completing function call arguments
• - Significance of incorporating broader contextual information beyond local file contexts in enhancing code language models for efficient program synthesis

Summary- Current code prediction tools have trouble understanding all the information needed for suggesting function arguments. - A new collection of freely available Python packages with complete projects and dependencies has been created to help improve this issue. - Using special tools to gather important information from programs helps in accurately predicting function arguments. - Asking these tools for specific details about a function call can greatly improve the accuracy of argument suggestions. - Taking into account how functions are written and used during both learning and predicting stages works better than existing methods. Definitions- Code completion models: Tools that suggest possible code snippets or completions based on what a programmer is typing. - Dataset: A collection of data or information used for analysis or research purposes. - Dependencies: Other pieces of code that a particular piece of code relies on to work correctly. - Program analyzers: Tools that examine and understand computer programs to extract useful information. - Inference stages: The process of using trained models to make predictions or decisions based on new data.

Introduction

Code completion is a crucial feature in modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) that helps developers write code more efficiently. It predicts the next line of code based on the context and saves time by reducing manual typing. However, existing code completion models often fall short when it comes to predicting function call arguments accurately. This limitation is due to their reliance on local file contexts, which do not provide enough information for accurate argument completion. In this paper, Pei et al. address this gap by proposing a new approach that leverages non-local context to enhance function call argument completion.

The Need for Better Context in Code Completion

Traditional code completion models rely on local file contexts, such as variable names and types, to predict function call arguments. While these features are useful, they do not capture the broader context of how functions are used within a project or its dependencies. For example, two different functions with similar names may have entirely different usage patterns and require different arguments. To overcome this limitation, Pei et al. propose incorporating non-local context into code language models for better performance in completing function call arguments.

The Dataset

To evaluate their proposed approach, the authors introduce a new dataset comprising permissively licensed Python packages with complete projects and dependencies. The dataset includes over 1 million unique function calls from 5 popular libraries: NumPy, SciPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, and Scikit-learn. The authors argue that using real-world projects instead of synthetic datasets allows for more realistic evaluation of model performance since it captures the complexity and diversity of actual coding scenarios.

Leveraging Program Analyzers

To extract non-local information essential for accurate function call argument completion from the dataset mentioned above, Pei et al. use program analyzers – tools that analyze source code to obtain various types of information, such as function implementation and usage patterns. They argue that these tools provide a more comprehensive understanding of the codebase compared to local file contexts.

The Proposed Approach

The authors propose a two-stage approach for predicting function call arguments. In the first stage, they train a model on local file contexts using traditional methods. In the second stage, they query a program analyzer for relevant non-local information related to the specific function call being predicted and incorporate it into their model during both training and inference stages. This approach allows for better consideration of broader contextual information beyond local file contexts, leading to improved performance in completing function call arguments.

Experimental Results

To evaluate their proposed approach, Pei et al. compare it with existing models on their newly introduced dataset. The results show that incorporating non-local context significantly improves model performance, outperforming existing models by up to 15% in accuracy. Furthermore, an ablation study is conducted to understand how different types of non-local context impact model performance. The authors find that combining multiple sources of data from program analyzers leads to better results than using only one type of information.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Pei et al.'s research highlights the limitations of existing code completion models in considering non-local context when predicting function call arguments. By introducing a new dataset and leveraging program analyzers for extracting relevant non-local information, they demonstrate significant improvements in model performance. Their findings emphasize the critical role of comprehensive context in enhancing code language models for efficient program synthesis and contribute valuable knowledge towards refining code completion systems.