Latent Exploration for Reinforcement Learning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Reinforcement Learning agents learn policies by exploring and interacting with the environment
- Challenges arise in learning policies mapping high-dimensional sensory input to motor output due to curse of dimensionality
- State-of-the-art methods like SAC and PPO use unstructured exploration through perturbing actuation with independent Gaussian noise during training
- Unstructured exploration may not be optimal for overactuated systems where multiple actuators drive behavior
- Introducing time correlation across action perturbations has been proposed as a solution, but correlation across actuators has been overlooked until now
- Lattice method injects temporally-correlated noise into the latent state of the policy network, integrating with on- and off-policy algorithms
- Structured action noise is modeled as a multivariate Gaussian distribution with full covariance matrix by perturbing network activations
- Experimental results show effectiveness of Lattice in improving performance for complex motor control tasks
- Lattice-SAC achieves state-of-the-art results in PyBullet locomotion tasks, outperforming unstructured exploration by 18% in Humanoid environment
- Lattice-PPO achieves higher rewards in musculoskeletal control environments like MyoSuite, discovering more energy-efficient policies with reductions ranging from 20% to 60%
- Study by Alberto Silvio Chiappa et al. showcases how structured action noise can significantly improve performance in challenging motor control scenarios
- Code for implementing Lattice is available at https://github.com/amathislab/lattice for further exploration and application
Authors: Alberto Silvio Chiappa, Alessandro Marin Vargas, Ann Zixiang Huang, Alexander Mathis
Abstract: In Reinforcement Learning, agents learn policies by exploring and interacting with the environment. Due to the curse of dimensionality, learning policies that map high-dimensional sensory input to motor output is particularly challenging. During training, state of the art methods (SAC, PPO, etc.) explore the environment by perturbing the actuation with independent Gaussian noise. While this unstructured exploration has proven successful in numerous tasks, it ought to be suboptimal for overactuated systems. When multiple actuators, such as motors or muscles, drive behavior, uncorrelated perturbations risk diminishing each other's effect, or modifying the behavior in a task-irrelevant way. While solutions to introduce time correlation across action perturbations exist, introducing correlation across actuators has been largely ignored. Here, we propose LATent TIme-Correlated Exploration (Lattice), a method to inject temporally-correlated noise into the latent state of the policy network, which can be seamlessly integrated with on- and off-policy algorithms. We demonstrate that the noisy actions generated by perturbing the network's activations can be modeled as a multivariate Gaussian distribution with a full covariance matrix. In the PyBullet locomotion tasks, Lattice-SAC achieves state of the art results, and reaches 18% higher reward than unstructured exploration in the Humanoid environment. In the musculoskeletal control environments of MyoSuite, Lattice-PPO achieves higher reward in most reaching and object manipulation tasks, while also finding more energy-efficient policies with reductions of 20-60%. Overall, we demonstrate the effectiveness of structured action noise in time and actuator space for complex motor control tasks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.