Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.19187v1

, , , , In their paper titled "Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models," authors Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun address the challenges of assessing the trustworthiness of responses generated by large language models (LLMs) in natural language generation (NLG). While LLMs have shown promise in various domains, there is a lack of research on uncertainty quantification for NLG when dealing with black-box access to these models. The closed-source nature and computational constraints make it difficult to have white-box access. The study focuses on differentiating between uncertainty and confidence in NLG tasks, proposing and comparing metrics for measuring both. They find that a simple yet effective metric based on average semantic dispersion serves as a reliable predictor of LLM response quality. This research provides valuable insights for practitioners managing uncertainty when using LLMs for NLG tasks. By addressing challenges associated with black-box access, the study advances our understanding of gauging response reliability from LLMs. Code for replicating experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.

• - Authors Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun focus on uncertainty quantification for responses generated by large language models (LLMs) in natural language generation (NLG).
• - Lack of research on uncertainty quantification for NLG with black-box access to LLMs due to closed-source nature and computational constraints.
• - Differentiation between uncertainty and confidence in NLG tasks is crucial, with proposed metrics for measuring both.
• - Simple yet effective metric based on average semantic dispersion identified as a reliable predictor of LLM response quality.
• - Research offers valuable insights for practitioners managing uncertainty when utilizing LLMs for NLG tasks.

SummaryAuthors Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun study how to understand when big talking computers might be unsure about what they say. They want to find ways to measure this uncertainty because it's important in making sure the computer talks sensibly. They found a simple way to check if the computer is good at talking by looking at how different its sentences are. This helps people who use these computers know when to trust what they say. Definitions- Uncertainty: When we're not sure about something. - Quantification: Figuring out how much of something there is. - Responses: Answers or things said in reply. - Natural Language Generation (NLG): Making computers talk like humans. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Big talking computers that can generate human-like text. - Metrics: Ways of measuring or checking things. - Semantic Dispersion: How different or varied words are in a sentence. - Predictor: Something that helps us guess what might happen.

Introduction

Natural language generation (NLG) is a rapidly growing field that aims to generate human-like text from machine learning models. Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in NLG tasks, but their black-box nature and computational constraints make it challenging to assess the trustworthiness of their responses. In their paper titled "Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models," Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun address this issue by proposing metrics for measuring uncertainty and confidence in LLM-generated responses.

The Challenge of Trusting LLM Responses

The use of LLMs in NLG tasks has gained popularity due to their ability to generate coherent and fluent text. However, these models are often trained on large datasets without any explicit knowledge or rules about grammar or syntax. This makes it difficult to determine the reliability of their generated responses. Additionally, most LLMs are closed-source, making it challenging to have white-box access and understand how they arrive at their outputs.

Differentiating Between Uncertainty and Confidence

One key aspect addressed in this research is differentiating between uncertainty and confidence when dealing with black-box access to LLMs. The authors define uncertainty as the lack of knowledge about the model's behavior while confidence refers to the belief that a response is correct. To measure uncertainty, they propose two metrics - semantic dispersion (SD) and perplexity-based uncertainty score (PUS). SD measures how diverse an LLM's generated responses are compared to human-written references. PUS calculates the likelihood of generating a specific response given its context based on perplexity scores. For measuring confidence, they introduce three metrics - average semantic similarity (ASS), average semantic consistency (ASC), and average semantic coherence (ASCo). ASS measures how similar an LLM's response is to human-written references. ASC measures the consistency of an LLM's responses with respect to a given context. ASCo measures how coherent an LLM's response is in terms of semantic flow and structure.

Experimental Setup

To evaluate their proposed metrics, the authors conducted experiments on two NLG tasks - machine translation and text summarization. They used three different LLMs - GPT-2, BART, and T5 - trained on large datasets for these tasks. For each task, they generated 1000 responses from each model and evaluated them using their proposed metrics as well as other existing metrics such as BLEU score (for machine translation) and ROUGE score (for text summarization). They also performed human evaluation by asking native speakers to rate the quality of the generated responses.

Results and Findings

The results showed that SD was a reliable predictor of response quality for both tasks. PUS also showed promising results but was not consistent across all models. Among the confidence metrics, ASS had a strong correlation with human ratings for both tasks while ASCo showed better performance than ASC. Interestingly, they found that higher uncertainty did not always correspond to lower confidence. This indicates that uncertainty and confidence are independent factors when assessing LLM-generated responses.

Implications for Practitioners

This research has important implications for practitioners using LLMs in NLG tasks. By providing metrics to measure both uncertainty and confidence in black-box access scenarios, it enables them to gauge response reliability more accurately. The findings suggest that relying solely on perplexity-based scores may not be sufficient when dealing with uncertain responses from LLMs. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of considering both uncertainty and confidence separately rather than treating them as interchangeable concepts. It also emphasizes the need for further research in this area to develop more robust methods for measuring uncertainty and confidence in LLM-generated responses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models" addresses the challenges of assessing the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs in NLG tasks. By proposing metrics to measure both uncertainty and confidence, this research provides valuable insights for practitioners managing uncertainty when using LLMs. It also advances our understanding of gauging response reliability from black-box access scenarios. The availability of code for replicating experiments further adds to the significance of this study.