Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model

AI-generated keywords: Automated short answer grading Analytic scores Holistic scores Language models Text similarity scoring

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model providing analytic and holistic scores
  • Approach enhances interpretability of scoring system and enables actionable feedback for students
  • Utilized large language model (LLM)-based one-shot prompting technique and text similarity scoring model with domain adaptation
  • ASAG model achieved accuracy of 0.67 and quadratic weighted kappa of 0.71 on subset of publicly available dataset
  • Significant improvement over majority baseline observed
  • Emphasizes benefits of incorporating analytic scoring methods in automated short answer grading systems
  • Importance of providing detailed feedback to enhance student learning outcomes highlighted
  • Innovative use of advanced language models and text similarity scoring techniques shows promising results in assessing short answer responses
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Su-Youn Yoon

7 pages, 2 figures

Abstract: In this study, we developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provided both analytic scores and final holistic scores. Short answer items typically consist of multiple sub-questions, and providing an analytic score and the text span relevant to each sub-question can increase the interpretability of the automated scores. Furthermore, they can be used to generate actionable feedback for students. Despite these advantages, most studies have focused on predicting only holistic scores due to the difficulty in constructing dataset with manual annotations. To address this difficulty, we used large language model (LLM)-based one-shot prompting and a text similarity scoring model with domain adaptation using small manually annotated dataset. The accuracy and quadratic weighted kappa of our model were 0.67 and 0.71 on a subset of the publicly available ASAG dataset. The model achieved a substantial improvement over the majority baseline.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.18638v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study "Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model," conducted by Su-Youn Yoon, developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provides both analytic and holistic scores. This approach enhances the interpretability of the scoring system and enables actionable feedback for students to improve their learning process. By utilizing a large language model (LLM)-based one-shot prompting technique and a text similarity scoring model with domain adaptation using a small manually annotated dataset, this research addresses challenges in constructing datasets with manual annotations. The ASAG model achieved an accuracy of 0.67 and a quadratic weighted kappa of 0.71 when evaluated on a subset of the publicly available ASAG dataset, showing significant improvement over the majority baseline. This study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating analytic scoring methods in automated short answer grading systems and emphasizes the importance of providing detailed feedback to enhance student learning outcomes. The innovative use of advanced language models and text similarity scoring techniques demonstrates promising results in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of assessing short answer responses in educational settings.
Created on 30 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.