Language Models Can Improve Event Prediction by Few-Shot Abductive Reasoning

AI-generated keywords: LAMP large language models event prediction abductive reasoning NeurIPS

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors introduce a novel framework called LAMP to enhance event sequence model performance
  • LAMP leverages the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to assist in making predictions about real-world events
  • Language model learns to suggest possible causes for future events and validates them using a search module
  • Extensive experiments show that LAMP outperforms existing state-of-the-art event sequence models
  • Integration of various reasoning abilities of LLMs can further enhance event sequence model performance
  • Importance of exploring reasoning capabilities to drive innovations in the field is emphasized
  • Framework extracts knowledge from pre-trained language models through few-shot prompting techniques, introducing domain-specific knowledge into event sequence modeling
  • Method emphasizes single-step reasoning process based on observable data rather than rule-based inference involving multiple steps
  • Positioned as a general framework adaptable to various prompting techniques with potential for advancing research in natural language processing and event prediction
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xiaoming Shi, Siqiao Xue, Kangrui Wang, Fan Zhou, James Y. Zhang, Jun Zhou, Chenhao Tan, Hongyuan Mei

NeurIPS 2023 camera-ready
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large language models have shown astonishing performance on a wide range of reasoning tasks. In this paper, we investigate whether they could reason about real-world events and help improve the prediction performance of event sequence models. We design LAMP, a framework that integrates a large language model in event prediction. Particularly, the language model performs abductive reasoning to assist an event sequence model: the event model proposes predictions on future events given the past; instructed by a few expert-annotated demonstrations, the language model learns to suggest possible causes for each proposal; a search module finds out the previous events that match the causes; a scoring function learns to examine whether the retrieved events could actually cause the proposal. Through extensive experiments on several challenging real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our framework -- thanks to the reasoning capabilities of large language models -- could significantly outperform the state-of-the-art event sequence models.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.16646v2

In this paper, the authors introduce , a novel framework that integrates to enhance performance. The framework leverages the capabilities of LLMs to assist event sequence models in making predictions about real-world events. By incorporating expert-annotated demonstrations, the language model learns to suggest possible causes for proposed future events, which are then validated by a search module that identifies previous events matching these causes. A scoring function evaluates whether the retrieved events could plausibly cause the proposed future event. Through extensive experiments on challenging real-world datasets, the authors demonstrate that their LAMP framework significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art event sequence models. The findings of this study have significant implications for future research in event sequence modeling. The authors suggest that integrating various reasoning abilities of LLMs, such as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning, could further enhance the performance of event sequence models. They emphasize the importance of exploring these capabilities to drive impactful innovations in the field. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge support from Adobe Research and express gratitude to anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback. They also thank colleagues at Ant Group, UChicago, and TTIC for insightful discussions. The paper distinguishes itself from previous research focused on textual features of events by emphasizing . While related work has treated text as auxiliary features without considering reasoning about it, this study highlights how LLMs can reason about both events and their textual information effectively. By extracting knowledge from pre-trained language models through few-shot prompting techniques rather than relying on human domain experts, the framework introduces domain-specific knowledge into event sequence modeling. Additionally, the paper draws connections to logical reasoning approaches like backward chaining but emphasizes a single-step reasoning process based on observable data rather than multiple steps involving rule-based inference. The authors position their method as a general framework adaptable to various prompting techniques and highlight its potential for advancing research in natural language processing and . Overall, this study underscores the transformative potential of integrating large language models into event prediction frameworks and sets a foundation for future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.
Created on 03 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.