Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.14627v1

In their paper titled "Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations," authors Tianyu Gao, Howard Yen, Jiatong Yu, and Danqi Chen address the issue of hallucination in generated outputs of large language models (LLMs). They emphasize the importance of improving factual correctness and verifiability in text generation by enabling LLMs to include citations. The existing methods for evaluating citation quality often rely on commercial search engines and human evaluation, which can be challenging to reproduce and compare across different modeling approaches. To address this gap, the authors propose ALCE, a benchmark designed specifically for Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation. , , , , ALCE includes a diverse set of questions and retrieval corpora, requiring the development of end-to-end systems that can retrieve supporting evidence and generate answers with proper citations. The benchmark introduces automatic metrics along three dimensions - fluency, correctness, and citation quality - which have shown strong correlation with human judgments. Through experiments involving state-of-the-art LLMs and innovative prompting strategies, the authors demonstrate that current systems have significant room for improvement. For instance, on the ELI5 dataset, even the best model exhibits instances where 49% of its generated text lacks complete citation support. Further analysis highlights potential future directions for enhancing these systems, such as developing better retrievers,,and improving the synthesis of information from multiple sources. Overall,this research contributes valuable insights into enhancing the reliability and accuracy of text generated by LLMs through proper citation integration. The ALCE benchmark serves as a crucial tool for evaluating and comparing different approaches in this domain while paving the way for advancements in automated citation generation within large language models.

• - Authors address the issue of hallucination in generated outputs of large language models (LLMs)
• - Importance of improving factual correctness and verifiability in text generation by enabling LLMs to include citations
• - Proposal of ALCE benchmark for Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation
• - ALCE includes diverse set of questions and retrieval corpora, requiring end-to-end systems for evidence retrieval and citation inclusion
• - Introduction of automatic metrics for fluency, correctness, and citation quality that correlate with human judgments
• - Experiment results show significant room for improvement in current systems, with instances where 49% of generated text lacks complete citation support
• - Potential future directions include developing better retrievers and improving information synthesis from multiple sources
• - Contribution to enhancing reliability and accuracy of text generated by LLMs through proper citation integration
• - ALCE benchmark as a crucial tool for evaluating and comparing different approaches in automated citation generation within large language models

Summary1. Authors talk about how sometimes big computer programs make mistakes when writing things. 2. They want to make sure the information is correct and can be checked by others. 3. They suggest a test called ALCE to see if these programs can include sources in their writing. 4. ALCE has different questions and materials to check if the program can find evidence and add sources. 5. They also created ways to measure how well the program writes, including if it includes proper sources. Definitions- Hallucination: Seeing or hearing something that isn't really there. - Factual correctness: Making sure information is true and accurate. - Verifiability: Being able to check and confirm information with evidence. - Citation: Giving credit to where you found information by mentioning the source. - Benchmark: A standard or test used for comparison or evaluation. - Fluency: How smoothly something is written or spoken without errors or pauses.

Introduction

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in generating human-like text, leading to their widespread use in various applications such as chatbots, question-answering systems, and language translation. However, these models often suffer from the issue of hallucination - generating information that is not supported by any evidence or source. This can lead to factual errors and lack of verifiability in the generated text. In their paper titled "Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations," authors Tianyu Gao, Howard Yen, Jiatong Yu, and Danqi Chen address this issue by proposing a benchmark called ALCE for evaluating citation quality in LLM-generated text. They highlight the importance of incorporating citations into LLMs to improve factual correctness and verifiability.

The Need for Citation Integration

The existing methods for evaluating citation quality often rely on commercial search engines and human evaluation, which can be challenging to reproduce and compare across different modeling approaches. This makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of different techniques for improving citation integration in LLMs. To address this gap, the authors propose ALCE - a benchmark specifically designed for Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation. It includes a diverse set of questions and retrieval corpora that require end-to-end systems capable of retrieving supporting evidence and generating answers with proper citations.

The Three Dimensions of Evaluation

ALCE introduces automatic metrics along three dimensions - fluency, correctness, and citation quality - which have shown strong correlation with human judgments. These metrics provide a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the performance of LLMs in terms of generating accurate and well-supported responses. Fluency measures how smoothly the generated text reads without any grammatical errors or awkward phrasings. Correctness evaluates whether the generated answer is factually correct based on its supporting evidence. Finally, citation quality assesses the accuracy and completeness of citations in the generated text.

Experiments and Results

The authors conduct experiments using state-of-the-art LLMs and innovative prompting strategies to evaluate their performance on the ALCE benchmark. They use the ELI5 dataset, which contains questions from Reddit's "Explain Like I'm 5" forum, as their main evaluation dataset. Their results show that even the best-performing LLM exhibits instances where 49% of its generated text lacks complete citation support. This highlights the significant room for improvement in current systems when it comes to incorporating proper citations into generated text. Further analysis of these results reveals potential future directions for enhancing LLMs' citation integration capabilities. These include developing better retrievers to retrieve relevant evidence and improving how information is synthesized from multiple sources to generate well-supported responses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper by Gao et al. provides valuable insights into addressing hallucination in large language models through proper citation integration. The proposed ALCE benchmark serves as a crucial tool for evaluating and comparing different approaches in this domain while paving the way for advancements in automated citation generation within LLMs. By emphasizing the importance of factual correctness and verifiability in text generation, this research contributes towards making LLM-generated content more reliable and accurate. It also opens up avenues for further research on improving citation integration techniques within large language models.