WikiChat: A Few-Shot LLM-Based Chatbot Grounded with Wikipedia

AI-generated keywords: WikiChat

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • WikiChat is a few-shot Large Language Model (LLM)-based chatbot that addresses limitations of existing LLMs in providing accurate and reliable information
  • LLMs struggle to speak accurately about events that occurred after their training and are prone to hallucination when discussing less popular topics
  • WikiChat leverages live information from Wikipedia to ground its responses
  • The development of WikiChat involved multiple iterations of experimentation and resulted in a pipeline based on information retrieval with three main components: suggesting facts using LLMs, verifying facts against Wikipedia for accuracy, and retrieving additional up-to-date information for coherent and engaging responses
  • The authors propose a hybrid human-and-LLM evaluation methodology to assess the factuality and conversationality of LLM-based chatbots, specifically focusing on recent and less popular topics
  • In evaluations against strong baselines, WikiChat outperforms all baselines in terms of factual accuracy by significant margins (up to 12.1%, 28.3%, and 32.7% on head, recent, and tail topics respectively)
  • WikiChat maintains naturalness, relevance, non-repetitiveness, and informational quality comparable to GPT-3
  • Overall, this paper presents WikiChat as an effective solution for enhancing the reliability and accuracy of LLM-based chatbots by grounding them with live information from Wikipedia
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sina J. Semnani, Violet Z. Yao, Heidi C. Zhang, Monica S. Lam

Abstract: Despite recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), users still cannot trust the information provided in their responses. LLMs cannot speak accurately about events that occurred after their training, which are often topics of great interest to users, and, as we show in this paper, they are highly prone to hallucination when talking about less popular (tail) topics. This paper presents WikiChat, a few-shot LLM-based chatbot that is grounded with live information from Wikipedia. Through many iterations of experimentation, we have crafte a pipeline based on information retrieval that (1) uses LLMs to suggest interesting and relevant facts that are individually verified against Wikipedia, (2) retrieves additional up-to-date information, and (3) composes coherent and engaging time-aware responses. We propose a novel hybrid human-and-LLM evaluation methodology to analyze the factuality and conversationality of LLM-based chatbots. We focus on evaluating important but previously neglected issues such as conversing about recent and tail topics. We evaluate WikiChat against strong fine-tuned and LLM-based baselines across a diverse set of conversation topics. We find that WikiChat outperforms all baselines in terms of the factual accuracy of its claims, by up to 12.1%, 28.3% and 32.7% on head, recent and tail topics, while matching GPT-3.5 in terms of providing natural, relevant, non-repetitive and informational responses.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.14292v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , This paper introduces WikiChat, a few-shot Large Language Model (LLM)-based chatbot that addresses the limitations of existing LLMs in providing accurate and reliable information. Despite recent advancements in LLMs, users still cannot fully trust the responses generated by these models. LLMs struggle to speak accurately about events that occurred after their training, which are often of great interest to users. Additionally, they are prone to hallucination when discussing less popular topics. To overcome these challenges, WikiChat leverages live information from Wikipedia to ground its responses. The development of WikiChat involved multiple iterations of experimentation and resulted in a pipeline based on information retrieval. This pipeline has three main components: 1. Using LLMs to suggest interesting and relevant facts. 2. Individually verifying these facts against Wikipedia for accuracy. 3. Retrieving additional up-to-date information and composing coherent and engaging time-aware responses. The authors propose a novel hybrid human-and-LLM evaluation methodology to assess the factuality and conversationality of LLM-based chatbots. They specifically focus on evaluating the ability of chatbots to converse about recent and less popular topics, which have been previously neglected. In evaluations against strong fine-tuned and LLM-based baselines across diverse conversation topics, WikiChat outperforms all baselines in terms of factual accuracy by significant margins. It achieves improvements of up to 12.1%, 28.3%, and 32.7% on head, recent, and tail topics respectively while maintaining naturalness, relevance, non-repetitiveness, and informational quality comparable to GPT-3. Overall, this paper presents WikiChat as an effective solution for enhancing the reliability and accuracy of LLM-based chatbots by grounding them with live information from Wikipedia. The proposed evaluation methodology sheds light on important aspects such as conversing about recent events and less popular topics that were previously overlooked.
Created on 21 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.