Uncertainty and Structure in Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

AI-generated keywords: Neural Ordinary Differential Equations Deep Learning Models Dynamical Systems Uncertainty Quantification Mechanistic Knowledge

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are powerful deep learning models for dynamical systems.
  • They learn ODE vector fields from observed trajectories, particularly in inverse problems.
  • Basic Bayesian deep learning techniques like the Laplace approximation applied to neural ODEs provide effective uncertainty quantification in scientific and engineering domains.
  • Scientific datasets often contain mechanistic knowledge, such as conservation laws, which can significantly impact modeling and prediction quality.
  • The study explores the interaction between mechanistic knowledge and uncertainty quantification in symplectic neural ODEs and physical models augmented with neural ODEs.
  • Uncertainty quantification reflects mechanistic information more directly than just predictive power alone, enhancing model extrapolation capabilities.
  • Incorporating structure derived from mechanistic knowledge can improve the performance of neural ODEs.
  • Leveraging both uncertainty quantification and structure is crucial for model development and evaluation in complex scientific domains.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Katharina Ott, Michael Tiemann, Philipp Hennig

Abstract: Neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are an emerging class of deep learning models for dynamical systems. They are particularly useful for learning an ODE vector field from observed trajectories (i.e., inverse problems). We here consider aspects of these models relevant for their application in science and engineering. Scientific predictions generally require structured uncertainty estimates. As a first contribution, we show that basic and lightweight Bayesian deep learning techniques like the Laplace approximation can be applied to neural ODEs to yield structured and meaningful uncertainty quantification. But, in the scientific domain, available information often goes beyond raw trajectories, and also includes mechanistic knowledge, e.g., in the form of conservation laws. We explore how mechanistic knowledge and uncertainty quantification interact on two recently proposed neural ODE frameworks - symplectic neural ODEs and physical models augmented with neural ODEs. In particular, uncertainty reflects the effect of mechanistic information more directly than the predictive power of the trained model could. And vice versa, structure can improve the extrapolation abilities of neural ODEs, a fact that can be best assessed in practice through uncertainty estimates. Our experimental analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the Laplace approach on both low dimensional ODE problems and a high dimensional partial differential equation.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.13290v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) have emerged as a powerful class of deep learning models for dynamical systems. They offer a unique approach to learning ODE vector fields from observed trajectories, particularly in inverse problems. In the realm of science and engineering, where structured uncertainty estimates are crucial for making accurate predictions, the application of basic Bayesian deep learning techniques such as the Laplace approximation to neural ODEs has proven to be effective in providing meaningful uncertainty quantification. However, scientific datasets often contain more than just raw trajectories; they may also incorporate mechanistic knowledge, such as conservation laws. This additional information can significantly impact the modeling process and the quality of predictions. In this study by Katharina Ott, Michael Tiemann, and Philipp Hennig, the interaction between mechanistic knowledge and uncertainty quantification is explored within two novel neural ODE frameworks: symplectic neural ODEs and physical models augmented with neural ODEs. The findings reveal that uncertainty quantification reflects the influence of mechanistic information more directly than the predictive power of the trained model alone. Conversely, incorporating structure derived from mechanistic knowledge can enhance the extrapolation capabilities of neural ODEs. This symbiotic relationship between uncertainty and structure underscores the importance of leveraging both aspects in model development and evaluation. Through experimental analysis on both low-dimensional ODE problems and a high-dimensional partial differential equation, the authors demonstrate the efficacy of employing the Laplace approach for structured uncertainty quantification in neural ODEs. By integrating mechanistic knowledge with uncertainty estimates, researchers can improve model performance and make more reliable predictions in complex scientific domains.
Created on 05 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.