Word differences in news media of lower and higher peace countries revealed by natural language processing and machine learning

AI-generated keywords: Language Conflict Peace Natural Language Processing Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Language plays a crucial role in causing and reflecting social processes that lead to conflict or peace.
  • Hate speech can incite violence, while peace speech can support processes that maintain peace.
  • The study used peace indices, machine learning, and online news sources to identify words linked to lower-peace versus higher-peace countries.
  • Little consensus exists on numerical values of peace indices due to varied measured social properties.
  • Greater agreement is found for extreme cases of lower-peace and higher-peace countries.
  • A data-driven approach with natural language processing and machine learning accurately classified countries based on peacefulness levels.
  • Machine learning model trained on word frequencies from extreme cases computed a quantitative peace index for intermediate-peace countries successfully.
  • Words related to "games," "teams," and "play" were unexpectedly representative of higher levels of peace.
  • Future studies could focus on identifying social processes reflected in linguistic differences for deeper understanding.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Larry S. Liebovitch (Queens College City University of New York), William Powers (Queens College City University of New York), Lin Shi (Queens College City University of New York), Allegra Chen-Carrel (University of San Francisco), Philippe Loustaunau (Vista Consulting), Peter T. Coleman (Columbia University)

21 pages, 4 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Language is both a cause and a consequence of the social processes that lead to conflict or peace. Hate speech can mobilize violence and destruction. What are the characteristics of peace speech that reflect and support the social processes that maintain peace? This study used existing peace indices, machine learning, and on-line, news media sources to identify the words most associated with lower-peace versus higher-peace countries. As each peace index measures different social properties, there is little consensus on the numerical values of these indices. There is however greater consensus with these indices for the countries that are at the extremes of lower-peace and higher-peace. Therefore, a data driven approach was used to find the words most important in distinguishing lower-peace and higher-peace countries. Rather than assuming a theoretical framework that predicts which words are more likely in lower-peace and higher-peace countries, and then searching for those words in news media, in this study, natural language processing and machine learning were used to identify the words that most accurately classified a country as lower-peace or higher-peace. Once the machine learning model was trained on the word frequencies from the extreme lower-peace and higher-peace countries, that model was also used to compute a quantitative peace index for these and other intermediate-peace countries. The model successfully yielded a quantitative peace index for intermediate-peace countries that was in between that of the lower-peace and higher-peace, even though they were not in the training set. This study demonstrates how natural language processing and machine learning can help to generate new quantitative measures of social systems, which in this study, were linguistic differences resulting in a quantitative index of peace for countries at different levels of peacefulness.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.12537v1

Language plays a crucial role in both causing and reflecting the social processes that lead to conflict or peace. Hate speech can incite violence and destruction, while peace speech can reflect and support the social processes that maintain peace. This study utilized existing peace indices, machine learning techniques, and online news sources to identify words associated with lower-peace versus higher-peace countries. The researchers found little consensus on the numerical values of peace indices due to different measured social properties. However, there is greater agreement for extreme cases of lower-peace and higher-peace countries. Using a data-driven approach with natural language processing and machine learning, the study identified words that accurately classified countries as lower-peace or higher-peace. Instead of relying on a theoretical framework to predict likely words in these countries, the researchers trained a machine learning model on word frequencies from extreme cases. This model then computed a quantitative peace index for intermediate-peace countries, successfully capturing their level of peacefulness even though they were not part of the training set. The study demonstrates how natural language processing and machine learning can generate new quantitative measures of social systems by analyzing linguistic differences. Surprisingly, analysis revealed unexpected findings such as words related to "games," "teams," and "play" being representative of higher levels of peace. Moving forward, future studies could focus on identifying the social processes reflected in these linguistic differences. Overall, this research highlights the importance of language in shaping perceptions and behaviors related to conflict and peace. By identifying key words associated with different levels of peace using advanced technologies like natural language processing and machine learning, researchers aim to deepen our understanding of how language influences societal dynamics and contributes to maintaining peaceful cultures.
Created on 03 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.