In their study "Common Diffusion Noise Schedules and Sample Steps are Flawed," researchers Shanchuan Lin, Bingchen Liu, Jiashi Li, and Xiao Yang address critical issues in existing diffusion noise schedules and sample steps. They reveal that these flawed designs do not enforce a zero signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the last timestep and some diffusion samplers do not start from the last timestep, leading to discrepancies between training and inference stages. This can greatly impact model performance, particularly in Stable Diffusion models which struggle with generating images of varying brightness levels. To remedy these problems, the researchers propose simple fixes such as rescaling the noise schedule to ensure a zero terminal SNR, training with v prediction, always starting the sampler from the last timestep, and rescaling classifier-free guidance to prevent over-exposure during sampling. These adjustments aim to align the diffusion process between training and inference stages, resulting in more accurate image samples that better reflect the original data distribution. The implementation section further demonstrates the validity of enforcing a zero terminal SNR mathematically while also highlighting common pitfalls in sampler implementations. Visualizations of sample steps showcase how different rescale factors can affect image generation based on specific prompts. The researchers stress the importance of avoiding ϵ formulation in sampler implementations like DDPM sampling. Overall, this study sheds light on crucial flaws in existing diffusion noise schedules and sample steps while offering practical solutions for improving model performance and generating diverse image samples across various brightness levels.
- - Existing diffusion noise schedules and sample steps have critical issues:
- - Flawed designs do not enforce a zero signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the last timestep
- - Some diffusion samplers do not start from the last timestep, causing discrepancies between training and inference stages
- - Impact on model performance, especially in Stable Diffusion models generating images of varying brightness levels
- - Proposed fixes by researchers:
- - Rescale noise schedule for zero terminal SNR
- - Train with v prediction
- - Always start sampler from the last timestep
- - Rescale classifier-free guidance to prevent over-exposure during sampling
- - Aim of adjustments: Align diffusion process between training and inference stages for more accurate image samples reflecting original data distribution
- - Implementation section highlights:
- - Validity of enforcing zero terminal SNR mathematically
- - Common pitfalls in sampler implementations
- - Visualizations demonstrate how different rescale factors affect image generation based on prompts
- - Importance stressed on avoiding ϵ formulation in sampler implementations like DDPM sampling
SummaryExisting noise schedules and sample steps have problems, like not ensuring a zero signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the end and starting from the wrong timestep. This affects how well models create images with different brightness levels. Researchers suggest fixes such as adjusting noise schedules and starting sampling correctly to improve model performance. The goal is to make sure training and creating images match up better. Visualizations show how changing factors can affect image quality.
Definitions- Diffusion: A process where something spreads out evenly from one place to another.
- Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR): A measurement of how much useful information there is compared to unwanted background noise.
- Inference: Making educated guesses or conclusions based on available information.
- Rescale: Adjusting or changing something to fit a specific scale or standard.
- Implementation: Putting a plan or idea into action.
Introduction
The use of diffusion models has gained popularity in recent years for its ability to generate high-quality image samples. However, a recent study by researchers Shanchuan Lin, Bingchen Liu, Jiashi Li, and Xiao Yang reveals critical flaws in existing diffusion noise schedules and sample steps that can greatly impact model performance. In their paper "Common Diffusion Noise Schedules and Sample Steps are Flawed," the researchers address these issues and propose simple fixes to improve the accuracy of image generation.
The Problem with Existing Diffusion Noise Schedules
Diffusion models rely on a noise schedule to gradually add noise to an input image over multiple timesteps. This process allows the model to learn the underlying data distribution and generate realistic images. However, as pointed out by the researchers, many existing diffusion noise schedules do not enforce a zero signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the last timestep. This means that there is still some residual signal present in the final output image, which can affect its quality.
Moreover, some diffusion samplers do not start from the last timestep during training, leading to discrepancies between training and inference stages. This can result in poor performance when generating images of varying brightness levels since Stable Diffusion models struggle with this task.
Solutions Proposed by Researchers
To address these issues, Lin et al. propose several simple fixes that aim to align the diffusion process between training and inference stages:
1) Rescaling Noise Schedule for Zero Terminal SNR
The first solution proposed by the researchers is rescaling the noise schedule so that it enforces a zero terminal SNR at each timestep during training. This ensures that there is no residual signal left in the final output image.
2) Training with v Prediction
Another fix suggested by Lin et al. is training with v prediction, which involves using the predicted noise level at each timestep to generate the next input image. This approach has been shown to improve model performance and reduce discrepancies between training and inference stages.
3) Always Starting Sampler from Last Timestep
To prevent discrepancies between training and inference stages, the researchers recommend always starting the sampler from the last timestep during both training and inference. This ensures that the diffusion process is consistent throughout.
4) Rescaling Classifier-Free Guidance
Finally, Lin et al. suggest rescaling classifier-free guidance to prevent over-exposure during sampling. This can help generate more diverse image samples across different brightness levels.
Implementation and Results
The implementation section of the paper provides a detailed explanation of how these solutions can be applied in practice. The researchers also demonstrate their validity mathematically while highlighting common pitfalls in sampler implementations.
Additionally, visualizations of sample steps are provided to showcase how different rescale factors can affect image generation based on specific prompts. These examples further support the effectiveness of the proposed fixes in improving model performance and generating more accurate image samples.
The researchers also stress the importance of avoiding ϵ formulation in sampler implementations like DDPM sampling, as it can lead to biased results.
Conclusion
In conclusion, "Common Diffusion Noise Schedules and Sample Steps are Flawed" sheds light on critical flaws in existing diffusion noise schedules and sample steps that can greatly impact model performance. By proposing simple fixes such as rescaling noise schedules for zero terminal SNR, training with v prediction, always starting samplers from last timestep, and rescaling classifier-free guidance, this study offers practical solutions for improving model accuracy and generating diverse image samples across various brightness levels.