Policy Gradient Algorithms Implicitly Optimize by Continuation

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Direct policy optimization in reinforcement learning is commonly addressed using policy-gradient algorithms
  • These algorithms optimize policy parameters through stochastic gradient ascent
  • The paper provides a new theoretical interpretation and justification for these algorithms within the optimization by continuation framework
  • Optimizing affine Gaussian policies and incorporating entropy regularization can be viewed as implicitly optimizing deterministic policies through continuation
  • Exploration in policy-gradient algorithms involves computing a continuation of the policy's return
  • Variance in policies should be history-dependent functions tailored to avoid local extrema rather than solely focusing on maximizing returns
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Adrien Bolland, Gilles Louppe, Damien Ernst

In Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023)
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Direct policy optimization in reinforcement learning is usually solved with policy-gradient algorithms, which optimize policy parameters via stochastic gradient ascent. This paper provides a new theoretical interpretation and justification of these algorithms. First, we formulate direct policy optimization in the optimization by continuation framework. The latter is a framework for optimizing nonconvex functions where a sequence of surrogate objective functions, called continuations, are locally optimized. Second, we show that optimizing affine Gaussian policies and performing entropy regularization can be interpreted as implicitly optimizing deterministic policies by continuation. Based on these theoretical results, we argue that exploration in policy-gradient algorithms consists in computing a continuation of the return of the policy at hand, and that the variance of policies should be history-dependent functions adapted to avoid local extrema rather than to maximize the return of the policy.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.06851v3

, , , , In the realm of reinforcement learning, direct policy optimization is commonly tackled using policy-gradient algorithms. These algorithms work to optimize policy parameters through stochastic gradient ascent. This paper offers a fresh theoretical interpretation and justification for these algorithms. The authors first frame direct policy optimization within the optimization by continuation framework, a method for optimizing nonconvex functions by iteratively optimizing surrogate objective functions known as continuations. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that optimizing affine Gaussian policies and incorporating entropy regularization can be seen as implicitly optimizing deterministic policies through continuation. Building upon these theoretical insights, they propose that exploration in policy-gradient algorithms involves computing a continuation of the policy's return. They also suggest that variance in policies should be history-dependent functions tailored to avoid local extrema rather than solely focusing on maximizing returns. The study was published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research in October 2023 and benefited from valuable discussions with Csaba Szepesvári regarding mathematical aspects that enhanced the quality of the research. The authors express gratitude to their colleagues Gaspard Lambrechts, Arnaud Delaunoy, Pascal Leroy, and Bardhyl Miftari for their insightful comments on the manuscript. Adrien Bolland acknowledges financial support from a research fellowship of the F.R.S.-FNRS.
Created on 19 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.