How Good are Commercial Large Language Models on African Languages?

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing Pretrained Language Models African Languages Commercial APIs Inclusivity

AI-generated Key Points

  • Recent advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have led to the widespread use of large pretrained language models.
  • Effectiveness of these models on African languages has not been extensively studied.
  • Preliminary analysis conducted on commercial large language models for eight African languages across different language families and geographical regions.
  • Evaluation focused on machine translation and text classification tasks.
  • Findings show subpar performance of commercial language models on African languages.
  • Better performance observed on text classification compared to machine translation for these languages.
  • Urgent need to ensure adequate representation of African languages in commercial large language models due to their increasing popularity and usage.
  • Study presented at AfricaNLP Workshop at ICLR 2023 by Jessica Ojo and Kelechi Ogueji from Masakhane.
  • Call-to-action emphasizes improving inclusivity of these models to better serve diverse linguistic communities worldwide.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jessica Ojo, Kelechi Ogueji

Presented at the AfricanNLP Workshop at ICLR 2023
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) has led to the proliferation of large pretrained language models. These models have been shown to yield good performance, using in-context learning, even on unseen tasks and languages. They have also been exposed as commercial APIs as a form of language-model-as-a-service, with great adoption. However, their performance on African languages is largely unknown. We present a preliminary analysis of commercial large language models on two tasks (machine translation and text classification) across eight African languages, spanning different language families and geographical areas. Our results suggest that commercial language models produce below-par performance on African languages. We also find that they perform better on text classification than machine translation. In general, our findings present a call-to-action to ensure African languages are well represented in commercial large language models, given their growing popularity.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.06530v1

Recent advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have led to the widespread use of large pretrained language models. However, their effectiveness on African languages has not been extensively studied. To address this gap, we conducted a preliminary analysis of commercial large language models on eight African languages across different language families and geographical regions. Specifically, we evaluated their performance on machine translation and text classification tasks. Our findings revealed that these commercial language models exhibit subpar performance when applied to African languages. Interestingly, we observed that they perform better on text classification compared to machine translation for these languages. Overall, our results underscore the urgent need to ensure that African languages are adequately represented in commercial large language models given their increasing popularity and usage. This study was presented at the AfricaNLP Workshop at ICLR 2023 by Jessica Ojo and Kelechi Ogueji from Masakhane. The call-to-action highlighted in our findings emphasizes the importance of improving the inclusivity of these models to better serve diverse linguistic communities worldwide.
Created on 21 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.