Prokaryotic genome editing based on the subtype I-B-Svi CRISPR-Cas system
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Subtype I-B-Svi CRISPR-Cas system found in Streptomyces virginiae IBL14
- Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are the most common among six types
- Subtype I-B-Svi consists of three confirmed CRISPRs and a cas gene cluster
- SviCas3 (771 amino acids) can direct template-based microbial genome editing
- Similar to animal-derived bacterial protein SpCas9 (1368 amino acids)
- No off-target changes or indel formation detected in potential off-target sites analysis
- Challenges previous belief that type I CRISPR-Cas systems require a full Cascade
- Broadens understanding of diversity of type I CRISPR-Cas systems
- Implications for development of new genome editing tools
- Valuable insights into prokaryotic genome editing and its potential applications in genetic engineering
Authors: Wang-Yu Tong, De-Xiang Yong, Xin Xu, Cai-Hua Qiu, Yan Zhang, Xing-Wang Yang, Ting-Ting Xia, Qing-Yang Liu, Su-Li Cao, Yan Sun, Xue Li
Abstract: Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are the most common among six types of CRISPR-Cas systems, however, non-self-targeting genome editing based on a single Cas3 of type I CRISPR-Cas systems has not been reported. Here, we present the subtype I-B-Svi CRISPR-Cas system (with three confirmed CRISPRs and a cas gene cluster) and genome editing based on this system found in Streptomyces virginiae IBL14. Importantly, like the animal-derived bacterial protein SpCas9 (1368 amino-acids), the single, compact, non-animal-derived bacterial protein SviCas3 (771 amino-acids) can also direct template-based microbial genome editing through the target cell's own homology-directed repair system, which breaks the view that the genome editing based on type I CRISPR-Cas systems requires a full Cascade. Notably, no off-target changes or indel-formation were detected in the analysis of potential off-target sites. This discovery broadens our understanding of the diversity of type I CRISPR-Cas systems and will facilitate new developments in genome editing tools.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.