Theory of shot noise in strange metals

AI-generated keywords: Shot noise Strange metals Fano factor Linear resistivity Electron-phonon scattering

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Theory of shot noise in strange metals
  • Extension of the Boltzmann equation with a noise source
  • Distribution functions dependent on excitation momentum and energy
  • Application to a model of a strange metal with linear resistivity in temperature ($T$)
  • Suppression of Fano factor in strange metals compared to diffusive metals with quasiparticles
  • Fano factor equal to $1/6$ at low temperatures, contrasting with $1/3$ in diffusive metals
  • Dependence of shot noise on temperature and applied voltage in the strange metal model
  • Consistency with recent observations by Chen et al. (arXiv:2206.00673)
  • Comparison between random Yukawa model and quasi-elastic electron-phonon scattering for linear resistivity in $T$
  • Shot noise as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing between mechanisms contributing to linear resistivity
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alexander Nikolaenko, Subir Sachdev, Aavishkar A. Patel

Physical Review Research 5, 043143 (2023)
arXiv: 2305.02336v4 - DOI (cond-mat.str-el)
30 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: We extend the theory of shot noise in coherent metals to shot noise in strange metals without quasiparticle excitations. This requires a generalization of the Boltzmann equation with a noise source to distribution functions which depend independently on the excitation momentum and energy. We apply this theory to a model of a strange metal with linear in temperature ($T$) resistivity, describing a Fermi surface with a spatially random Yukawa coupling to a critical boson. We find a suppression of the Fano factor in the strange metal, and describe the dependence of the shot noise on temperature and applied voltage. At low temperatures, we obtain a Fano factor equal to $1/6$, in contrast to the $1/3$ Fano factor in diffusive metals with quasiparticles. Our results are in general agreement with recent observations by Chen et al. (arXiv:2206.00673). We further compare the random Yukawa model to quasi-elastic electron-phonon scattering that also generates $T$-linear resistivity, and argue that shot noise observations offer a useful diagnostic to distinguish between them.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02336v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Theory of shot noise in strange metals," Alexander Nikolaenko, Subir Sachdev, and Aavishkar A. Patel extend the theory of shot noise to strange metals that lack quasiparticle excitations. This extension requires a generalization of the Boltzmann equation with a noise source to distribution functions that independently depend on both excitation momentum and energy. The authors apply this theory to a model of a strange metal with linear resistivity in temperature ($T$). The model describes a Fermi surface with a spatially random Yukawa coupling to a critical boson. They find that the Fano factor, which characterizes the suppression or enhancement of shot noise relative to Poisson statistics, is suppressed in the strange metal compared to diffusive metals with quasiparticles. At low temperatures, they obtain a Fano factor equal to $1/6$, contrasting with the $1/3$ Fano factor observed in diffusive metals. The study also explores the dependence of shot noise on temperature and applied voltage in the strange metal model. The authors note that their results are generally consistent with recent observations by Chen et al. (arXiv:2206.00673). Furthermore, they compare their random Yukawa model to quasi-elastic electron-phonon scattering, which also generates linear resistivity in temperature ($T$). They argue that shot noise observations can serve as a useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing between these two mechanisms. Overall, this paper presents an extended theory of shot noise in strange metals without quasiparticle excitations and applies it to a specific model describing a Fermi surface coupled to critical bosons. The findings highlight the suppression of the Fano factor in strange metals and provide insights into how shot noise depends on temperature and applied voltage. Additionally, the study suggests that shot noise measurements can help differentiate between different mechanisms contributing to linear resistivity in temperature.
Created on 28 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.