Cosmic backreaction and the mean redshift drift from symbolic regression

Authors: S. M. Koksbang

Phys. Rev. D 107, 103522 (2023)
arXiv: 2305.01223v2 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
20 pages incl. 16 captioned figures. Accepted for publication in PRD. v2: Updated bibliography. No other changes

Abstract: The possibility of obtaining symbolic expressions for cosmic backreaction is explored through a case study of so-called 2-region models. By using the publicly available symbolic regression algorithm AI Feynman, it is shown that the kinematical backreaction from a single 2-region model can be well described as a function of the mean redshift (or, equivalently, the volume averaged scale factor). A single expression depending on the redshift/scale factor as well as a model parameter, $f$, that can accurately describe the backreaction for a significant range of models is naturally more complicated but is also achieved with percent-level accuracy. \newline\indent Data sets of redshift drift in the 2-region models are also considered. Again utilizing AI Feynman, expressions for the redshift drift are found. In particular, an expression for the difference between the mean redshift drift and the drift of the mean redshift in terms of the kinematical backreaction is easily obtained for a single 2-region model. An accurate symbolic expression that describes this difference for an array of 2-region models is achieved by using the redshift as a feature instead of the kinematical backreaction.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.01223v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 30 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.