ReLBOT: A Transfer Learning Approach to Minimize Reinforcement Learning Risks in Smart Buildings
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Smart buildings aim to optimize energy consumption using AI algorithms
- Lack of historical data for training these algorithms during commissioning
- Online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms show promise but carry risk of discomfort to residents
- Proposed technique called ReLBOT utilizes transfer learning and deep RL
- ReLBOT transfers knowledge from an existing optimized smart building to a newly commissioned one
- Aims to reduce adverse impact of RL agent's warm-up period
- Significant improvements demonstrated, including reduction in duration and prediction variance
- Research addresses challenges in initial exploration phase of RL algorithms in smart buildings
- ReLBOT minimizes risks while optimizing energy consumption levels through AI-driven algorithms.
Authors: Mikhail Genkin, J. J. McArthru
Abstract: Smart buildings aim to optimize energy consumption by applying artificial intelligent algorithms. When a smart building is commissioned there is no historical data that could be used to train these algorithms. On-line Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have shown significant promise, but their deployment carries a significant risk, because as the RL agent initially explores its action space it could cause significant discomfort to the building residents. In this paper we present ReLBOT, a new technique that uses transfer learning in conjunction with deep RL to transfer knowledge from an existing, optimized smart building, to the newly commissioning building, to reduce the adverse impact of the reinforcement learning agent's warm-up period. We demonstrate improvements of up to 6.2 times in the duration, and up to 132 times in prediction variance for the reinforcement learning agent's warm-up period.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.