A Systematization of Cybersecurity Regulations, Standards and Guidelines for the Healthcare Sector

AI-generated keywords: Cybersecurity

AI-generated Key Points

  • The healthcare sector's adoption of IT solutions has led to an increase in cybersecurity incidents
  • Organizations worldwide have implemented regulations, standards, and best practices for cybersecurity and data protection in healthcare
  • Operators still struggle to defend against cyber attacks despite these measures
  • The authors conducted a systematization of significant cybersecurity documents relevant to the healthcare sector
  • 49 important documents were collected and analyzed to identify key excerpts related to technical security and governance measures
  • Manual analysis by experts was conducted to identify relevant excerpts
  • Approximately 2,800 key excerpts were identified across the 49 documents
  • The NIST Cybersecurity Framework v1.1 was used to map the key excerpts, with an extension from the Italian Cybersecurity Framework for data security and privacy
  • Most of the mapped excerpts fell under the Protection and Identify functions within the framework, with few addressing Respond, Detect, and Recover functions
  • The paper successfully systematized cybersecurity regulations, standards, and best practices in the healthcare sector resulting in 2,800 security controls and nine findings.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Maria Patrizia Carello, Alberto Marchetti Spaccamela, Leonardo Querzoni, Marco Angelini

14 pages
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: The growing adoption of IT solutions in the healthcare sector is leading to a steady increase in the number of cybersecurity incidents. As a result, organizations worldwide have introduced regulations, standards, and best practices to address cybersecurity and data protection issues in this sector. However, the application of this large corpus of documents presents operational difficulties, and operators continue to lag behind in resilience to cyber attacks. This paper contributes a systematization of the significant cybersecurity documents relevant to the healthcare sector. We collected the 49 most significant documents and used the NIST cybersecurity framework to categorize key information and support the implementation of cybersecurity measures.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.14955v1

The healthcare sector's increasing adoption of IT solutions has led to a rise in cybersecurity incidents. To address this issue, organizations worldwide have implemented regulations, standards, and best practices for cybersecurity and data protection in healthcare. However, the application of these documents presents operational challenges, and operators still struggle to defend against cyber attacks. In this paper, the authors contribute a systematization of significant cybersecurity documents relevant to the healthcare sector. They collected 49 important documents and analyzed them to identify key excerpts related to technical security and governance measures. The identification process involved manual analysis by experts in security governance, cybersecurity, and data protection. The identified excerpts were then extracted from their original documents and compiled into a table for further analysis. Another group of information security specialists reviewed the collected excerpts to ensure their relevance. This step helps organize the texts and extract only the relevant contents related to security and data protection. The results of the document analysis showed that approximately 2,800 key excerpts were identified across the 49 documents. These excerpts were distributed among different categories as depicted in Figure 3. In the next step, these key excerpts were mapped using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework v1.1, which provides standard terminology for cybersecurity functionalities. Since some excerpts referred to data security and privacy, an extension of the framework was necessary. The Italian Cybersecurity Framework was leveraged as it includes categories and subcategories dedicated to data protection while being retro-compatible with the NIST framework. Each excerpt was carefully assessed for its semantic content and linked to one or more subcategories of the framework based on its function, category, and subcategory. The mapping process helped identify overlaps between different excerpts and resolve them accordingly. The results showed that most of the mapped excerpts fell under the Protection and Identify functions within the framework. Only a few addressed Respond, Detect, and Recover functions. In conclusion, this paper successfully systematized cybersecurity regulations, standards, and best practices in the healthcare sector. The analysis of 49 documents resulted in the identification of 2,800 security controls and nine findings.
Created on 11 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.