Pretrain on just structure: Understanding linguistic inductive biases using transfer learning

AI-generated keywords: Inductive bias Transfer learning Language models Zipfian distribution Hierarchical processing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study explores inductive learning biases in humans and transformer language models.
  • The authors pretrain language models on artificial structured data and fine-tune them on English.
  • Three types of inductive biases are examined: recursive, hierarchical processing; unrestricted token-token dependencies; and Zipfian power-law vocabulary distribution.
  • Complex token-token interactions provide effective inductive biases, especially when context-free grammars are insufficient.
  • A Zipfian vocabulary distribution serves as a good independent inductive bias regardless of grammatical structure.
  • Transformer models enable controlled language learning experiments not feasible with human subjects.
  • The findings contribute to understanding language learning and processing mechanisms in both humans and machines.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Isabel Papadimitriou, Dan Jurafsky

Abstract: Both humans and transformer language models are able to learn language without explicit structural supervision. What inductive learning biases make this learning possible? In this study, we examine the effect of different inductive learning biases by predisposing language models with structural biases through pretraining on artificial structured data, and then evaluating by fine-tuning on English. Our experimental setup gives us the ability to actively control the inductive bias of language models. With our experiments, we investigate the comparative success of three types of inductive bias: 1) an inductive bias for recursive, hierarchical processing 2) an inductive bias for unrestricted token-token dependencies that can't be modeled by context-free grammars, and 3) an inductive bias for a Zipfian power-law vocabulary distribution. We show that complex token-token interactions form the best inductive biases, and that this is strongest in the non-context-free case. We also show that a Zipfian vocabulary distribution forms a good inductive bias independently from grammatical structure. Our study leverages the capabilities of transformer models to run controlled language learning experiments that are not possible to run in humans, and surfaces hypotheses about the structures that facilitate language learning in both humans and machines.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.13060v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Pretrain on just structure: Understanding linguistic inductive biases using transfer learning," authors Isabel Papadimitriou and Dan Jurafsky explore the inductive learning biases that enable both humans and transformer language models to learn language without explicit structural supervision. They investigate the effect of different inductive biases by pretraining language models on artificial structured data and then fine-tuning them on English. This experimental setup allows them to actively control the inductive bias of the language models. The authors specifically examine three types of inductive bias: 1) an inductive bias for recursive, hierarchical processing, 2) an inductive bias for unrestricted token-token dependencies that cannot be modeled by context-free grammars, and 3) an inductive bias for a Zipfian power-law vocabulary distribution. Through their experiments, they find that complex token-token interactions provide the most effective inductive biases, particularly in cases where context-free grammars are insufficient. Additionally, they discover that a Zipfian vocabulary distribution serves as a good independent inductive bias regardless of grammatical structure. This study leverages the capabilities of transformer models to conduct controlled language learning experiments which are not feasible with human subjects. The findings shed light on the structures that facilitate language learning in both humans and machines, generating hypotheses about their shared mechanisms. Overall, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how language is learned and processed by exploring different types of inductive biases. It provides insight into how transfer learning can be used to understand linguistic induction in both humans and machines.
Created on 30 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.