Spectroscopy from Photometry: A Population of Extreme Emission Line Galaxies at $1.7 \lesssim z \lesssim 6.7$ Selected with JWST Medium Band Filters

AI-generated keywords: EELGs NIRCam CANUCS Equivalent Widths Cosmic Time

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study utilizes JWST/NIRCam medium band photometry in CANUCS
  • Identifies 118 Extreme Emission Line Galaxies (EELGs) within redshift range of $1.7 \lesssim z \lesssim 6.7$
  • Selection based on color cuts targeting extreme $\text{[OIII] + H}\beta$ and H$\alpha$ emission
  • Medium band color selections allow identification based on emission line equivalent width (EW)
  • Median EW(\Ha) = 893 Å, median EW(\OIIIHb) = 1255 Å
  • EELGs are compact with low stellar mass, low metallicity, minimal dust content, and high specific star formation rates
  • Increase in both EW(\Ha) and EW(\OIIIHb) with increasing redshift
  • Anti-correlation between EW(\Ha) and stellar mass; no correlation between EW(\OIIIHb) and stellar mass
  • NIRSpec spectroscopy confirms redshifts and equivalent widths for 15 EELGs
  • Advantages of using medium band photometry to study EELGs without relying on strong continuum emission
  • Insights into properties and evolution of EELGs related to redshift, stellar mass, and emission line strengths
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sunna Withers, Adam Muzzin, Swara Ravindranath, Ghassan T. Sarrouh, Roberto Abraham, Yoshihisa Asada, Marusa Bradac, Gabriel Brammer, Guillaume Desprez, Kartheik Iyer, Nicholas Martis, Lamiya Mowla, Gaël Noirot, Marcin Sawicki, Victoria Strait, Chris J. Willott

arXiv: 2304.11181v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Submitted to ApJL. 11 pages, 5 figures, animated Figure 1 is available to view here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTjjjyFRJys and available for download here: https://github.com/sunnawithers/EELG_colours/blob/main/Figure1_EELGcolours_Withers%2B2023.mp4
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We use JWST/NIRCam medium band photometry in a single pointing of the CAnadian NIRISS Unbiased Cluster Survey (CANUCS) to identify 118 Extreme Emission Line Galaxies (EELGs) over $1.7 \lesssim z \lesssim 6.7$, selected using a set of color cuts that target galaxies with extreme $\text{[OIII] + H}\beta$ and H$\alpha$ emission. We show that our medium band color selections are able to select galaxies based on emission line equivalent width (EW), which is advantageous to more commonly used selections since it does not require strong continuum emission, and can select galaxies with faint or red continuum fluxes. The median EWs of our sample is $EW(\text{H}\alpha) = 893 $ \AA\ and $ EW(\text{[OIII] + H}\beta) = 1255 $ \AA, and includes some objects with $EW(\text{[OIII] + H}\beta) \sim 3000$ \AA. These systems are mostly compact with low stellar mass (median $\log(M_\star/M_\odot) = 8.03$), low metallicity (median $Z = 0.14 Z_\odot$), little dust (median $A_V = 0.18$ mag) and high SSFR (median $SSFR = 1.18 \times 10^{-8}/yr$). Additionally, galaxies in our sample show increasing EW(\Ha) and EW(\OIIIHb) with redshift, an anti-correlation of EW(\Ha) with stellar mass, and no correlation between EW(\OIIIHb) and stellar mass. Finally, we present NIRSpec spectroscopy of 15 of the EELGs in our sample. These spectra confirm the redshifts and EWs of the EELGs calculated from the medium bands, which demonstrates the accuracy and efficiency of our color selections. Overall, we show that there are significant advantages to using medium band photometry to identify and study EELGs at a wide range of redshifts.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.11181v1

This study utilizes JWST/NIRCam medium band photometry in a single pointing of the CAnadian NIRISS Unbiased Cluster Survey (CANUCS) to identify 118 Extreme Emission Line Galaxies (EELGs) within the redshift range of $1.7 \lesssim z \lesssim 6.7$. The selection of these galaxies is based on specific color cuts that target extreme $\text{[OIII] + H}\beta$ and H$\alpha$ emission. The advantage of using medium band color selections is that it allows for the identification of galaxies based on their emission line equivalent width (EW), without requiring strong continuum emission. This method is particularly useful for selecting galaxies with faint or red continuum fluxes. The median equivalent widths of the identified sample are $EW(\text{H}\alpha) = 893 $ Å and $ EW(\text{[OIII] + H}\beta) = 1255 $ Å, with some objects exhibiting even higher values, such as $EW(\text{[OIII] + H}\beta) \sim 3000$ Å. These EELGs are predominantly compact in nature, characterized by low stellar mass (median $\log(M_\star/M_\odot) = 8.03$), low metallicity (median $Z = 0.14 Z_\odot$), minimal dust content (median $A_V = 0.18$ mag), and high specific star formation rates (median $SSFR = 1.18 \times 10^{-8}/yr$). Furthermore, an analysis reveals several interesting trends: there is a clear increase in both EW(\Ha) and EW(\OIIIHb) with increasing redshift; an anti-correlation between EW(\Ha) and stellar mass; however, no correlation between EW(\OIIIHb) and stellar mass. To validate the accuracy and efficiency of their color selections, the authors present NIRSpec spectroscopy results for 15 EELGs in their sample which confirm the redshifts and equivalent widths calculated from the medium bands. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the advantages of using medium band photometry to identify and study EELGs across a wide range of redshifts without relying on strong continuum emission which allows for including galaxies with faint or red continuum fluxes. The findings also provide valuable insights into the properties and evolution of EELGs related to redshift, stellar mass, and emission line strengths.
Created on 31 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.