Are the ultra-high-redshift galaxies at z > 10 surprising in the context of standard galaxy formation models?
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Yung et al. study ultra-high redshift galaxies with redshifts greater than 10 using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).
- They utilize Santa Cruz semi-analytic models and GUREFT suite of cosmological N-body simulations to compare observational findings with current galaxy formation models.
- The dust-free models predict significantly lower galaxy number densities at z~11 and z~13 compared to observational estimates, with discrepancies of an order of magnitude and a factor of ~30 respectively.
- Uncertainties in observed number densities due to cosmic variance are estimated to range from ~20-30% at z=11 to ~30-80% at z=14 for a 100 sq arcmin field.
- Stellar-driven winds are identified as the primary limiting factor for the formation of luminous galaxies during these early epochs.
- Introducing a modest boost to UV luminosities or incorporating a stochastic component is suggested to better align model predictions with observational data.
- The study highlights challenges and discrepancies in modeling ultra-high redshift galaxies, offering potential avenues for refining existing galaxy formation models.
Authors: L. Y. Aaron Yung, Rachel S. Somerville, Steven L. Finkelstein, Stephen M. Wilkins, Jonathan P. Gardner
Abstract: A substantial number of ultra-high redshift (8 < z < 17) galaxy candidates have been detected with JWST, posing the question: are these observational results surprising in the context of current galaxy formation models? We address this question using the well-established Santa Cruz semi-analytic models, implemented within merger trees from the new suite of cosmological N-body simulations GUREFT, which were carefully designed for ultra-high redshift studies. Using our fiducial models calibrated at z=0, we present predictions for stellar mass functions, rest-frame UV luminosity functions, and various scaling relations. We find that our (dust-free) models predict galaxy number densities at z~11 (z~13) that are an order of magnitude (a factor of ~30) lower than the observational estimates. We estimate the uncertainty in the observed number densities due to cosmic variance, and find that it leads to a fractional error of ~20-30% at z=11 (~30-80% at z=14) for a 100 sq arcmin field. We explore which processes in our models are most likely to be rate-limiting for the formation of luminous galaxies at these early epochs, considering the halo formation rate, gas cooling, star formation, and stellar feedback, and conclude that it is mainly efficient stellar-driven winds. We find that a modest boost of a factor of ~4 to the UV luminosities, which could arise from a top-heavy stellar initial mass function, would bring our current models into agreement with the observations. Adding a stochastic component to the UV luminosity can also reconcile our results with the observations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.