Femtosecond pulse parameter estimation from photoelectron momenta using machine learning
AI-generated Key Points
- Researchers explore the application of deep learning models, specifically CNNs, in analyzing strong-field ionization photoelectron spectra
- CNNs are widely used for feature extraction and parameter estimation in image-like data
- Researchers aim to "invert" experimental data by training on theoretical data sets
- Main focus is pulse characterization and retrieving laser intensity using CNNs
- Traditional measurements often lead to uncertainties of around 20% in determining laser intensity
- Data augmentation techniques, including accounting for detector saturation, are employed to successfully train on theoretical data and obtain consistent results from experiments
- Predictive uncertainty estimation allows for reliable extraction of laser intensity uncertainties with an accuracy of a few percent, consistently lower than traditional techniques
- Interpretability methods identify parts of the distribution most sensitive to laser intensity, directly associated with holographic interferences
- CNNs provide an accurate and convenient way to extract parameters from strong-field ionization spectra and serve as a novel interpretational tool beyond pulse characterization
- Transfer learning demonstrates the generalizability of CNNs even without extensive training data
- "Explainability" capability of CNNs showcased by identifying relevant features in photoelectron momentum distributions (PMDs) connected directly to physical processes like holographic interferences
- Deep learning models like CNNs have significant potential for analyzing strong-field ionization processes, offering improved accuracy, reliability, and interpretability compared to traditional methods.
Authors: Tomasz Szołdra, Marcelo F. Ciappina, Nicholas Werby, Philip H. Bucksbaum, Maciej Lewenstein, Jakub Zakrzewski, Andrew S. Maxwell
Abstract: Deep learning models have provided huge interpretation power for image-like data. Specifically, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated incredible acuity for tasks such as feature extraction or parameter estimation. Here we test CNNs on strong-field ionization photoelectron spectra, training on theoretical data sets to `invert' experimental data. Pulse characterization is used as a `testing ground', specifically we retrieve the laser intensity, where `traditional' measurements typically lead to 20% uncertainty. We report on crucial data augmentation techniques required to successfully train on theoretical data and return consistent results from experiments, including accounting for detector saturation. The same procedure can be repeated to apply CNNs in a range of scenarios for strong-field ionization. Using a predictive uncertainty estimation, reliable laser intensity uncertainties of a few percent can be extracted, which are consistently lower than those given by traditional techniques. Using interpretability methods can reveal parts of the distribution that are most sensitive to laser intensity, which can be directly associated with holographic interferences. The CNNs employed provide an accurate and convenient ways to extract parameters, and represent a novel interpretational tool for strong-field ionization spectra.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.