Exploring Smart Commercial Building Occupants' Perceptions and Notification Preferences of Internet of Things Data Collection in the United States

AI-generated keywords: IoT Data Collection Notifications Perception Smart Buildings

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study explores perceptions and notification preferences of occupants in smart commercial buildings regarding data collection through IoT devices
  • Lack of awareness among participants about data collection practices associated with IoT devices
  • Misunderstandings among participants regarding different data practices
  • Majority of participants express a desire to be notified about data practices in smart buildings
  • Preference for push notifications over passive methods such as websites or physical signs
  • Mobile app notifications are the least preferred method for smart commercial buildings
  • Emphasizes the need to study occupants' understanding and perception of data collection in smart commercial buildings
  • Clear communication strategies tailored to each building's context and audience needs can enhance occupant trust and acceptance of IoT technologies while promoting convenience and energy efficiency.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tu Le, Alan Wang, Yaxing Yao, Yuanyuan Feng, Arsalan Heydarian, Norman Sadeh, Yuan Tian

2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy

Abstract: Data collection through the Internet of Things (IoT) devices, or smart devices, in commercial buildings enables possibilities for increased convenience and energy efficiency. However, such benefits face a large perceptual challenge when being implemented in practice, due to the different ways occupants working in the buildings understand and trust in the data collection. The semi-public, pervasive, and multi-modal nature of data collection in smart buildings points to the need to study occupants' understanding of data collection and notification preferences. We conduct an online study with 492 participants in the US who report working in smart commercial buildings regarding: 1) awareness and perception of data collection in smart commercial buildings, 2) privacy notification preferences, and 3) potential factors for privacy notification preferences. We find that around half of the participants are not fully aware of the data collection and use practices of IoT even though they notice the presence of IoT devices and sensors. We also discover many misunderstandings around different data practices. The majority of participants want to be notified of data practices in smart buildings, and they prefer push notifications to passive ones such as websites or physical signs. Surprisingly, mobile app notification, despite being a popular channel for smart homes, is the least preferred method for smart commercial buildings.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.04955v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study explores the perceptions and notification preferences of occupants in smart commercial buildings regarding data collection through Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The aim is to understand how occupants perceive and trust the data collection practices in these buildings. The researchers conducted an online study with 492 participants who reported working in smart commercial buildings in the United States. The findings reveal that despite noticing the presence of IoT devices and sensors, around half of the participants are not fully aware of the data collection and use practices associated with them. This lack of awareness highlights a significant challenge in implementing IoT technologies in practice. Additionally, the study uncovers several misunderstandings among participants regarding different data practices. Interestingly, the majority of participants express a desire to be notified about data practices in smart buildings. They prefer push notifications over passive methods such as websites or physical signs. Surprisingly, mobile app notifications, which are popular for smart homes, are found to be the least preferred method for smart commercial buildings. Overall, this research emphasizes the need to study occupants' understanding and perception of data collection in smart commercial buildings. By addressing these concerns and preferences through clear communication strategies tailored to each building's context and audience needs, building owners and managers can enhance occupant trust and acceptance of IoT technologies while promoting convenience and energy efficiency.
Created on 31 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.