Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Formal Verification Large Language Models Proof Generation Proof Repair Automated Software Development

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Introduction of a novel method for automating formal verification in software properties
  • Proposal of leveraging large language models trained on natural language text, code, and fine-tuned on proofs
  • Generation of whole proofs for theorems at once instead of step-by-step generation
  • Combination of proof generation model with a fine-tuned repair model to fix issues in generated proofs
  • Demonstration that whole-proof generation using transformers is as effective as search-based techniques without costly search operations
  • Introduction of additional context to the learned model, such as prior failed proof attempts and associated error messages, leading to improved proof repair and automated proof generation
  • Establishment of a new state-of-the-art for fully automated proof synthesis
  • Development and evaluation of a prototype called Baldur on a benchmark comprising 6,336 Isabelle/HOL theorems and their corresponding proofs
  • Comparison with an existing tool called Thor, showing that Baldur can automatically generate proofs for an additional 8.7% of the theorems compared to Thor
  • Achievement of full automation in proving 65.7% of the considered theorems by combining Baldur and Thor
  • Opening up new avenues for utilizing large language models in automating formal verification and streamlining software development processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Emily First, Markus N. Rabe, Talia Ringer, Yuriy Brun

Abstract: Formally verifying software properties is a highly desirable but labor-intensive task. Recent work has developed methods to automate formal verification using proof assistants, such as Coq and Isabelle/HOL, e.g., by training a model to predict one proof step at a time, and using that model to search through the space of possible proofs. This paper introduces a new method to automate formal verification: We use large language models, trained on natural language text and code and fine-tuned on proofs, to generate whole proofs for theorems at once, rather than one step at a time. We combine this proof generation model with a fine-tuned repair model to repair generated proofs, further increasing proving power. As its main contributions, this paper demonstrates for the first time that: (1) Whole-proof generation using transformers is possible and is as effective as search-based techniques without requiring costly search. (2) Giving the learned model additional context, such as a prior failed proof attempt and the ensuing error message, results in proof repair and further improves automated proof generation. (3) We establish a new state of the art for fully automated proof synthesis. We reify our method in a prototype, Baldur, and evaluate it on a benchmark of 6,336 Isabelle/HOL theorems and their proofs. In addition to empirically showing the effectiveness of whole-proof generation, repair, and added context, we show that Baldur improves on the state-of-the-art tool, Thor, by automatically generating proofs for an additional 8.7% of the theorems. Together, Baldur and Thor can prove 65.7% of the theorems fully automatically. This paper paves the way for new research into using large language models for automating formal verification.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.04910v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Models" introduces a novel method for automating formal verification in software properties. The task of formally verifying software properties is highly desirable but requires significant manual effort. Previous work has explored the use of proof assistants like Coq and Isabelle/HOL to automate formal verification by training models to predict individual proof steps and searching through possible proofs. In this paper, the authors propose a new approach that leverages large language models trained on natural language text, code, and fine-tuned on proofs. Instead of generating proofs one step at a time, their method enables the generation of whole proofs for theorems at once. To further enhance the proving power, they combine this proof generation model with a fine-tuned repair model to fix any issues in the generated proofs. The main contributions of this research are as follows (1) The demonstration that whole-proof generation using transformers is not only feasible but also as effective as search-based techniques without requiring costly search operations. (2) The introduction of additional context to the learned model, such as prior failed proof attempts and associated error messages, which leads to improved proof repair and automated proof generation. (3) The establishment of a new state-of-the-art for fully automated proof synthesis. To validate their approach, the authors develop a prototype called Baldur and evaluate it on a benchmark comprising 6,336 Isabelle/HOL theorems and their corresponding proofs. Through empirical analysis, they demonstrate the effectiveness of whole-proof generation, repair capabilities, and added context. Additionally, they compare Baldur with an existing tool called Thor and show that Baldur can automatically generate proofs for an additional 8.7% of the theorems compared to Thor. Together,BaldurandThorachieve full automation in proving 65.7% of the considered theorems. This research opens up new avenues for utilizing large language models in automating formal verification. By leveraging the capabilities of these models, the labor-intensive task of formal verification can be significantly streamlined, leading to more efficient software development processes.
Created on 10 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.