Differential Privacy Meets Neural Network Pruning

AI-generated keywords: Differential Privacy Neural Network Pruning DP-SGD Parameter Selection Scalability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the challenge of scalability in applying differential privacy to training deep neural network models
  • They focus on the DP-SGD algorithm, which struggles with training moderately-sized neural network models when high privacy protection is desired
  • Authors propose exploring dimensionality reduction techniques inspired by neural network pruning to improve scalability of DP-SGD
  • Two modes of parameter updates: parameter freezing and parameter selection
  • Parameter freezing involves pre-pruning the network and only updating remaining parameters using DP-SGD, reducing parameter space and improving efficiency
  • Parameter selection involves selecting which parameters to update at each step of training and updating only those selected using DP-SGD
  • Leveraging public data for freezing or selecting parameters aims to avoid additional privacy loss during these steps, success depends on how closely private and public data are related
  • Experiments demonstrate that decreasing parameter space improves differentially private training performance
  • Random selection and magnitude-based selection are two popular forms of pruning that do not rely on gradients and do not incur additional privacy loss; random selection performs equally well as magnitude-based selection in DP-SGD training
  • Paper presents a novel approach for addressing scalability challenges in applying differential privacy to deep neural network models by incorporating dimensionality reduction techniques inspired by neural network pruning
  • Offers insights into improving efficiency without compromising privacy protection by leveraging public data for freezing or selecting parameters while avoiding any additional privacy loss incurred during these steps.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kamil Adamczewski, Mijung Park

Abstract: A major challenge in applying differential privacy to training deep neural network models is scalability.The widely-used training algorithm, differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), struggles with training moderately-sized neural network models for a value of epsilon corresponding to a high level of privacy protection. In this paper, we explore the idea of dimensionality reduction inspired by neural network pruning to improve the scalability of DP-SGD. We study the interplay between neural network pruning and differential privacy, through the two modes of parameter updates. We call the first mode, parameter freezing, where we pre-prune the network and only update the remaining parameters using DP-SGD. We call the second mode, parameter selection, where we select which parameters to update at each step of training and update only those selected using DP-SGD. In these modes, we use public data for freezing or selecting parameters to avoid privacy loss incurring in these steps. Naturally, the closeness between the private and public data plays an important role in the success of this paradigm. Our experimental results demonstrate how decreasing the parameter space improves differentially private training. Moreover, by studying two popular forms of pruning which do not rely on gradients and do not incur an additional privacy loss, we show that random selection performs on par with magnitude-based selection when it comes to DP-SGD training.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.04612v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Differential Privacy Meets Neural Network Pruning," authors Kamil Adamczewski and Mijung Park address the challenge of scalability in applying differential privacy to training deep neural network models. They focus on the widely-used training algorithm called differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), which struggles with training moderately-sized neural network models when a high level of privacy protection is desired. To improve the scalability of DP-SGD, the authors propose exploring dimensionality reduction techniques inspired by neural network pruning. They investigate how neural network pruning and differential privacy can work together through two modes of parameter updates: parameter freezing and parameter selection. In the first mode, parameter freezing, the authors pre-prune the network and only update the remaining parameters using DP-SGD. This approach helps reduce the parameter space and improve efficiency. In the second mode, parameter selection, they select which parameters to update at each step of training and update only those selected using DP-SGD. By leveraging public data for freezing or selecting parameters, they aim to avoid incurring additional privacy loss during these steps. The success of this paradigm relies on how closely private and public data are related. The authors conduct experiments that demonstrate how decreasing the parameter space improves differentially private training performance. Additionally, they study two popular forms of pruning that do not rely on gradients and do not incur additional privacy loss: random selection and magnitude-based selection. Their results show that random selection performs equally well as magnitude-based selection when it comes to DP-SGD training. Overall, this paper presents a novel approach for addressing scalability challenges in applying differential privacy to deep neural network models by incorporating dimensionality reduction techniques inspired by neural network pruning. It offers insights into improving efficiency without compromising privacy protection by leveraging public data for freezing or selecting parameters while avoiding any additional privacy loss incurred during these steps.
Created on 03 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.