Blockchain-Empowered Lifecycle Management for AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Products in Edge Networks

AI-generated keywords: Edge AIGC Blockchain-empowered Framework Reputation Scheme Proof-of-AIGC Incentive Mechanism

AI-generated Key Points

  • Rapid development of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) brings challenges: service latency, security, and trustworthiness
  • Edge AIGC paradigm proposed to optimize service latency by distributing AIGC services to edge devices
  • Challenges include tampering, plagiarism, lack of trustworthiness in open networks hindering circulation of AIGC products
  • Blockchain-empowered framework introduced for managing lifecycle of edge AIGC products
  • Framework includes components and mechanisms:
  • Protecting ownership and copyright of AIGC
  • Ensuring legitimate and timely exchanges of funds-AIGC ownership among anonymous users
  • Establishing a reputation scheme for determining trustworthy edge service providers (ESPs)
  • Reputation scheme considers local opinions from producers and recommended opinions from other producers to quantify ESP trustworthiness
  • Numerical results show superiority of proposed approach in reputation trends among ESPs and total number of assigned tasks
  • Framework incorporates on-chain mechanisms: Proof-of-AIGC, incentive mechanism based on HTL, reputation-based ESP selection mechanism
  • Comprehensive solution for managing lifecycle of edge AIGC products addressing challenges related to service latency, security, trustworthiness, and copyright protection
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yinqiu Liu (Sherman), Hongyang Du (Sherman), Dusit Niyato (Sherman), Jiawen Kang (Sherman), Zehui Xiong (Sherman), Chunyan Miao (Sherman), Xuemin (Sherman), Shen, Abbas Jamalipour

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The rapid development of Artificial IntelligenceGenerated Content (AIGC) has brought daunting challenges regarding service latency, security, and trustworthiness. Recently, researchers presented the edge AIGC paradigm, effectively optimize the service latency by distributing AIGC services to edge devices. However, AIGC products are still unprotected and vulnerable to tampering and plagiarization. Moreover, as a kind of online non-fungible digital property, the free circulation of AIGC products is hindered by the lack of trustworthiness in open networks. In this article, for the first time, we present a blockchain-empowered framework to manage the lifecycle of edge AIGC products. Specifically, leveraging fraud proof, we first propose a protocol to protect the ownership and copyright of AIGC, called Proof-of-AIGC. Then, we design an incentive mechanism to guarantee the legitimate and timely executions of the funds-AIGC ownership exchanges among anonymous users. Furthermore, we build a multi-weight subjective logic-based reputation scheme, with which AIGC producers can determine which edge service provider is trustworthy and reliable to handle their services. Through numerical results, the superiority of the proposed approach is demonstrated. Last but not least, we discuss important open directions for further research.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.02836v1

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) has brought about various challenges, including service latency, security and trustworthiness. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed the edge AIGC paradigm which distributes AIGC services to edge devices to optimize service latency. However, AIGC products are still vulnerable to tampering and plagiarism as well as the lack of trustworthiness in open networks hindering the free circulation of AIGC products. In this article, a blockchain-empowered framework is introduced for managing the lifecycle of edge AIGC products. The framework includes several components and mechanisms aimed at protecting ownership and copyright of AIGC, ensuring legitimate and timely exchanges of funds-AIGC ownership among anonymous users and establishing a reputation scheme for determining trustworthy and reliable edge service providers. The reputation scheme takes into account both local opinions generated by producers based on their interactions with edge service providers (ESPs) and recommended opinions received from other producers. The overall opinion is calculated by averaging all received recommended opinions with weights assigned based on familiarity between producers and ESPs as well as the value of previous interactions. This reputation calculation process helps quantify the trustworthiness of ESPs enabling producers to easily determine which ESP is more reliable. Numerical results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach in terms of reputation trends among different ESPs and total number of assigned tasks. The reputation scheme successfully achieves its design goals by quantifying ESP trustworthiness, alleviating potential service congestion caused by relying solely on familiar ESPs and encouraging high-quality AIGC services from ESPs. Furthermore, the framework incorporates three on-chain mechanisms: Proof-of-AIGC for defending against plagiarization; an incentive mechanism based on HTL to protect funds-AIGC ownership exchange; and a reputation-based ESP selection mechanism for effective scheduling of AIGC generation services. Overall, this blockchain-empowered framework provides a comprehensive solution for managing the lifecycle of edge AIGC products addressing challenges related to service latency, security trustworthiness and copyright protection. The framework's components and mechanisms work together to ensure the integrity and reliability of AIGC services in open networks.
Created on 25 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.