In the field of software engineering (SE), diversity and inclusion are crucial for driving technological innovation that benefits society as a whole. To address this, a study was conducted to explore how diversity is embedded in SE research, specifically in participant studies. The researchers analyzed 79 research papers containing 105 participant studies from three years of ICSE technical tracks. Using a content analytical approach, they examined how SE researchers reported the diversity categories of their study participants and investigated the extent to which participants were described, the commonly reported diversity categories, and the function diversity served in these studies. The study identified 12 different diversity categories reported in SE participant studies. The results revealed that while most SE studies reported on the diversity of participants, there was a tendency to emphasize professional diversity data such as occupation and work experience over social diversity data like gender or location. Additionally, the analysis showed that participant diversity was rarely analyzed or reflected upon when discussing study results, outcomes, or limitations. To help researchers enhance their awareness of study diversity, the authors proposed a diversity awareness model and guidelines that SE researchers can apply to their own research. By shedding light on this issue, the study aims to contribute to addressing the ongoing crisis of diversity and inclusion in software engineering. Overall,this research highlights the importance of considering not only demographic representation but also diverse perspectives and experiences within SE research.By incorporating greater attention to participant diversity and its implications throughout all stages of research, software engineers can ensure more inclusive and impactful technological advancements for society.
- - Diversity and inclusion are crucial for driving technological innovation in software engineering (SE)
- - A study analyzed 79 research papers with 105 participant studies from ICSE technical tracks
- - 12 different diversity categories were identified in SE participant studies
- - There was a tendency to emphasize professional diversity over social diversity data
- - Participant diversity was rarely analyzed or reflected upon when discussing study results
- - The authors proposed a diversity awareness model and guidelines for SE researchers
- - The study aims to contribute to addressing the ongoing crisis of diversity and inclusion in SE
- - Importance of considering diverse perspectives and experiences within SE research
- - Incorporating attention to participant diversity can ensure more inclusive and impactful technological advancements.
Diversity and inclusion means having different kinds of people working together. Technological innovation in software engineering means coming up with new ideas and inventions in computer programming. A study looked at many research papers about software engineering. They found that there are many different types of diversity in these studies. Some studies focused more on professional differences, like job titles, while others didn't look at diversity at all. The authors of the study want researchers to think more about diversity and have suggested some guidelines for them to follow. They hope this will help make software engineering more diverse and inclusive, which is important for making better technology."
Definitions- Diversity: having different kinds of people or things
- Inclusion: including everyone and making sure they feel welcome
- Technological innovation: coming up with new ideas and inventions in technology
- Software engineering: the field of creating computer programs
- Research papers: articles written by experts that share new information or findings
Introduction
Software engineering (SE) is a rapidly growing field that plays a crucial role in shaping our society. As technology continues to advance and become more integrated into our daily lives, it is important for SE researchers to consider the diverse needs and perspectives of their users. This includes not only demographic diversity but also diversity in experiences, backgrounds, and perspectives. In order to drive technological innovation that benefits society as a whole, it is essential for SE research to be inclusive and representative of diverse populations.
In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on diversity and inclusion within the tech industry. However, this issue still persists in many areas of SE research. To address this gap, a study was conducted by researchers from various institutions including University College London and Carnegie Mellon University. The study aimed to explore how diversity is embedded in SE research through an analysis of participant studies.
The Study
The researchers analyzed 79 research papers containing 105 participant studies from three years of International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) technical tracks. Using a content analytical approach, they examined how SE researchers reported the diversity categories of their study participants.
Diversity Categories
The results revealed 12 different diversity categories reported in SE participant studies: gender, age range/generation/cohort, nationality/ethnicity/culture/race/language/religion/beliefs/values/traditions/customs/practices/habits/norms/lifestyle/background/geography/region/location/residence/citizenship/migration status/diaspora/refugee/asylum seeker/international student/expat/local/native/indigenous/native-born/foreign-born/third culture kid/global nomad/transnational identity; occupation/profession/job title/work experience/skill level; education/institutional affiliation/discipline/major/coursework/research topic/focus area/specialization/degree type; industry/company/organization/sector; role/function/responsibility/task/job duty; team/group/composition/division/hierarchy/dynamics/collaboration/cooperation/partnership/interaction/communication/work style/culture/climate/atmosphere/environment; personality/trait/type/tendency/preference/style/motivation/value/belief/goal/aspiration/passion/interest/strength/skill/knowledge/experience/expertise/perspective/thought process/problem-solving approach/intelligence/emotional intelligence/social intelligence/spiritual intelligence/artistic intelligence/practical intelligence/logical-mathematical intelligence/naturalistic intelligence/existential intelligence/intrapersonal intelligence/interpersonal intelligence/bodily-kinesthetic intelligence/musical-rhythmicintelligence/literacy/writing ability/oratory skills/public speaking skills/listening skills/nonverbal communication skills/teamwork skills/time management skills/project management skills/conflict resolution skills/negotiation skills/delegation and empowerment abilities/networking abilities/flexibility/adaptability/resilience/initiative/resourcefulness/risk-taking attitude/openness to experience/conscientiousness/extroversion/introversion/agreeableness/neuroticism/self-esteem/self-efficacy/self-confidence/assertiveness/empathy/sympathy/altruism/grit/growth mindset; disability/challenge/barrier/accessibility/accommodation/support/service animal/sign language interpreter/equipment/device/tool/software/platform/interface/system/architecture/design/code/documentation/manual/tutorial/help file/video tutorial/forum/community/user group/meetup/event/conference/workshop/course/bootcamp/hackathon/challenge/game/jam/maker space/incubator/startup accelerator/business plan competition/pitch contest/demo day/showcase/product launch/release/version/update/change/request for comment (RFC); user/customer/client/end-user/stakeholder/investor/shareholder/partner/vendor/provider/supplier/channel partner/distributor/franchisee/licensee/franchisor/licensor/license holder/rights holder/owner/copyright holder/trademark owner/patent holder/intellectual property (IP) rights holder; product/service/software/application/system/tool/platform/interface/device/gadget/machine/appliance/instrument/equipment/facility/infrastructure/architecture/design/code/documentation/manual/tutorial/help file/video tutorial/forum/community/user group/meetup/event/conference/workshop/course/bootcamp/hackathon/challenge/game/jam/maker space/incubator/startup accelerator/business plan competition/pitch contest/demo day/showcase/product launch/release/version/update/change/RFC; and user/customer/client/end-user/stakeholder/investor/shareholder/partner/vendor/provider/supplier/channel partner/distributor/franchisee/licensee/franchisor/licensor/license holder/rights holder/owner/copyright holder/trademark owner/patent holder/IP rights holder.
Emphasis on Professional Diversity
The results also revealed a tendency to emphasize professional diversity data such as occupation and work experience over social diversity data like gender or location. This suggests that while SE researchers are aware of the importance of diversity, they may not fully understand the significance of considering diverse perspectives and experiences within their studies.
Lack of Analysis and Reflection
Another key finding from the study was that participant diversity was rarely analyzed or reflected upon when discussing study results, outcomes, or limitations. This highlights a lack of awareness among SE researchers regarding the implications of participant diversity in their research.
The Proposed Model and Guidelines
To help address this issue, the authors proposed a diversity awareness model and guidelines for SE researchers to apply to their own research. The model consists of three stages: pre-study, during-study, and post-study. In each stage, specific actions are recommended for researchers to enhance their awareness of study diversity. These include conducting literature reviews on relevant topics related to participant diversity, actively seeking out diverse participants, and reflecting on the implications of diversity in study results.
Implications for SE Research
This study sheds light on the ongoing crisis of diversity and inclusion in software engineering. By highlighting the importance of considering not only demographic representation but also diverse perspectives and experiences within SE research, this research aims to contribute to addressing this issue. By incorporating greater attention to participant diversity and its implications throughout all stages of research, software engineers can ensure more inclusive and impactful technological advancements for society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study emphasizes the crucial role that diversity plays in driving technological innovation in software engineering. It highlights the need for SE researchers to not only consider demographic representation but also diverse perspectives and experiences within their studies. The proposed model and guidelines provide a framework for researchers to enhance their awareness of study diversity and ultimately contribute to creating a more inclusive field of software engineering.