Promises and pitfalls of deep neural networks in neuroimaging-based psychiatric research

AI-generated keywords: Neuroimaging-based psychiatric research Deep neural networks Convolutional neural networks Methodological concepts Challenges

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Deep neural networks are a powerful tool in neuroimaging-based psychiatric research for accurate diagnostics and treatment recommendations.
  • Methodological concepts such as representation and transfer learning, as well as domain-specific priors, contribute to the advancement of deep neural networks in this field.
  • Applications include diagnosing psychiatric diseases, delineating disease subtypes, normative modeling, and developing neuroimaging biomarkers.
  • Challenges include training models on small, heterogeneous, and biased datasets, lack of validity in clinical labels leading to potential bias, and confounding variables affecting result interpretation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Fabian Eitel, Marc-André Schulz, Moritz Seiler, Henrik Walter, Kerstin Ritter

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: By promising more accurate diagnostics and individual treatment recommendations, deep neural networks and in particular convolutional neural networks have advanced to a powerful tool in medical imaging. Here, we first give an introduction into methodological key concepts and resulting methodological promises including representation and transfer learning, as well as modelling domain-specific priors. After reviewing recent applications within neuroimaging-based psychiatric research, such as the diagnosis of psychiatric diseases, delineation of disease subtypes, normative modeling, and the development of neuroimaging biomarkers, we discuss current challenges. This includes for example the difficulty of training models on small, heterogeneous and biased data sets, the lack of validity of clinical labels, algorithmic bias, and the influence of confounding variables.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.08525v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of neuroimaging-based psychiatric research, deep neural networks have emerged as a powerful tool for providing more accurate diagnostics and individual treatment recommendations. This advancement is attributed to key methodological concepts such as representation and transfer learning, as well as the modeling of domain-specific priors. Recent applications in this area include the diagnosis of psychiatric diseases, delineation of disease subtypes, normative modeling, and the development of neuroimaging biomarkers. However, despite these promising developments, there are several challenges that need to be addressed. One major issue is the difficulty of training models on small, heterogeneous, and biased datasets. Additionally, there is a lack of validity in clinical labels used for training these models, leading to potential algorithmic bias. Moreover, the influence of confounding variables poses a significant challenge in accurately interpreting results obtained from deep neural networks in neuroimaging-based psychiatric research. Their work provides valuable insights into the current state of utilizing deep neural networks for medical imaging applications within psychiatric research while highlighting areas that require further attention and refinement for future advancements in this field.
Created on 12 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.