InPars-v2: Large Language Models as Efficient Dataset Generators for Information Retrieval

AI-generated keywords: InPars-v2 LLMs synthetic query-document pairs information retrieval tasks Promptagator

AI-generated Key Points

InPars-v2 is a novel approach to information retrieval that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic query-document pairs.
It builds upon the previous work of Bonifacio et al. in InPars, enhancing it by incorporating a reranker as a filtering mechanism for identifying relevant synthetic examples.
The key distinction between InPars and Promptagator is in their implementations: InPars uses proprietary LLMs like GPT-3 and FLAN for dataset generation, while Promptagator employs dataset-specific prompts and a larger LLM alongside a fully trainable retrieval pipeline with smaller models.
Inpars-v1 and Inpars-v2 represent iterative advancements in leveraging LLMs for dataset generation in information retrieval tasks.
The authors opt for an open-source query generator over proprietary tools used in prior research, making their methodology more accessible and reproducible.
Detailed insights into the experimental setup highlight the use of open-source GPT-J for synthetic query generation and emphasize reproducibility through shared source code and data tailored for TPUs.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Vitor Jeronymo, Luiz Bonifacio, Hugo Abonizio, Marzieh Fadaee, Roberto Lotufo, Jakub Zavrel, Rodrigo Nogueira

arXiv: 2301.01820v1 - DOI (cs.IR)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recently, InPars introduced a method to efficiently use large language models (LLMs) in information retrieval tasks: via few-shot examples, an LLM is induced to generate relevant queries for documents. These synthetic query-document pairs can then be used to train a retriever. However, InPars and, more recently, Promptagator, rely on proprietary LLMs such as GPT-3 and FLAN to generate such datasets. In this work we introduce InPars-v2, a dataset generator that uses open-source LLMs and existing powerful rerankers to select synthetic query-document pairs for training. A simple BM25 retrieval pipeline followed by a monoT5 reranker finetuned on InPars-v2 data achieves new state-of-the-art results on the BEIR benchmark. To allow researchers to further improve our method, we open source the code, synthetic data, and finetuned models: https://github.com/zetaalphavector/inPars/tree/master/tpu

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.01820v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

InPars-v2: A Novel Approach to Information Retrieval Using LLMs and Synthetic Query-Document Pairs Bonifacio et al. have introduced a novel approach, InPars-v2, which builds upon their previous work InPars. This latest iteration leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic query-document pairs for information retrieval tasks. Similar to Promptagator, another recent model that utilizes LLMs for creating alternative queries in an unsupervised manner. However, the key distinction between InPars and Promptagator lies in their implementations. While InPars uses proprietary LLMs like GPT-3 and FLAN for dataset generation, Promptagator employs dataset-specific prompts and a larger LLM alongside a fully trainable retrieval pipeline with smaller models. Bonifacio et al. enhance the original InPars framework by incorporating a reranker as a filtering mechanism to identify the most relevant synthetic examples. This enhancement results in superior performance on the BEIR benchmark. Furthermore, the authors opt for an open-source query generator over proprietary tools used in prior research, making their methodology more accessible and reproducible. Referred to as Inpars-v1 and Inpars-v2 respectively, these models represent iterative advancements in leveraging LLMs for dataset generation in information retrieval tasks. The authors provide detailed insights into their experimental setup, highlighting the use of open-source GPT-J for synthetic query generation and emphasizing the reproducibility of their results through shared source code and data tailored for TPUs. Overall, this refined summary showcases how Bonifacio et al. 's innovative approach not only builds upon existing research but also sets new benchmarks in information retrieval through efficient dataset generation using open-source tools and advanced reranking techniques.

- InPars-v2 is a novel approach to information retrieval that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic query-document pairs.
- It builds upon the previous work of Bonifacio et al. in InPars, enhancing it by incorporating a reranker as a filtering mechanism for identifying relevant synthetic examples.
- The key distinction between InPars and Promptagator is in their implementations: InPars uses proprietary LLMs like GPT-3 and FLAN for dataset generation, while Promptagator employs dataset-specific prompts and a larger LLM alongside a fully trainable retrieval pipeline with smaller models.
- Inpars-v1 and Inpars-v2 represent iterative advancements in leveraging LLMs for dataset generation in information retrieval tasks.
- The authors opt for an open-source query generator over proprietary tools used in prior research, making their methodology more accessible and reproducible.
- Detailed insights into the experimental setup highlight the use of open-source GPT-J for synthetic query generation and emphasize reproducibility through shared source code and data tailored for TPUs.

Summary- InPars-v2 is a new way to find information using big language models to make questions and answers. - It improves on earlier work by adding a filter to pick out the best questions and answers. - InPars uses special big language models like GPT-3 and FLAN, while Promptagator uses its own prompts and smaller models. - Inpars-v1 and Inpars-v2 are steps forward in using big language models for finding information. - The authors use a tool that anyone can use instead of special tools, making their method easier for others to try. Definitions- Information retrieval: Finding and getting information from sources like the internet. - Language model: A computer program that understands and generates human language. - Synthetic: Made or created artificially, not naturally occurring. - Reranker: A tool that sorts or filters items based on certain criteria. - Dataset: A collection of data used for analysis or research.

Introduction

In the world of information retrieval, the use of large language models (LLMs) has gained significant attention in recent years. These models have shown great potential in generating synthetic query-document pairs for improving retrieval performance. InPars-v2, a new approach introduced by Bonifacio et al., builds upon their previous work InPars and leverages LLMs to generate synthetic examples for information retrieval tasks.

InPars: The Original Framework

The original InPars framework utilized proprietary LLMs such as GPT-3 and FLAN for dataset generation. It focused on creating alternative queries to improve retrieval performance without any supervision or human intervention. However, this approach had limitations as it relied on expensive proprietary tools and lacked a filtering mechanism to identify the most relevant synthetic examples.

Promptagator vs InPars

Another recent model that utilizes LLMs for creating alternative queries is Promptagator. While both Promptagator and InPars utilize LLMs for dataset generation, they differ in their implementations. Promptagator uses dataset-specific prompts and a larger LLM alongside a fully trainable retrieval pipeline with smaller models.

Inpars-v1: An Iterative Advancement

Building upon their previous work, Bonifacio et al. introduced Inpars-v1 which incorporated an open-source query generator instead of relying on expensive proprietary tools like GPT-3 and FLAN. This made their methodology more accessible and reproducible.

Inpars-v2: Enhanced Performance Through Reranking

Inpars-v2 further enhances the original framework by incorporating a reranker as a filtering mechanism to identify the most relevant synthetic examples generated by the open-source query generator used in Inpars-v1. This enhancement resulted in superior performance on the BEIR benchmark compared to both Promptagator and Inpars-v1.

Experimental Setup

Bonifacio et al. provide detailed insights into their experimental setup, highlighting the use of open-source GPT-J for synthetic query generation. They also emphasize the reproducibility of their results through shared source code and data tailored for TPUs.

Open-Source Tools for Dataset Generation

The use of open-source tools like GPT-J makes Inpars-v2 more accessible and reproducible compared to previous approaches that relied on expensive proprietary tools.

Reranking Technique

Incorporating a reranker as a filtering mechanism in Inpars-v2 improves retrieval performance by identifying the most relevant synthetic examples generated by the open-source query generator.

Reproducibility Through Shared Source Code and Data

Bonifacio et al. have made their source code and data available, tailored for TPUs, making it easier for other researchers to reproduce their results and build upon their work.

Conclusion

InPars-v2 is an innovative approach that builds upon existing research in leveraging LLMs for dataset generation in information retrieval tasks. It sets new benchmarks through efficient dataset generation using open-source tools and advanced reranking techniques. The authors' emphasis on reproducibility through shared source code and data makes this approach more accessible to other researchers. With further advancements, InPars-v2 has the potential to revolutionize information retrieval methods using LLMs.

Created on 05 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.