One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings

AI-generated keywords: Text Embeddings INSTRUCTOR Instruction-Finetuning Multitask Learning Downstream Tasks

AI-generated Key Points

INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that generates text embeddings based on task instructions
Trained using multitask mixture with contrastive loss on annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks
Achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse datasets with an average improvement of 3.4%
Robust to changes in instructions and effective in addressing the challenge of training a single model on varied datasets
Utilizes text embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping sentence embeddings frozen for classification tasks
Measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of embeddings for semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks
Discusses automatic summarization evaluation methods in the context of evaluating performance on downstream tasks

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hongjin Su, Weijia Shi, Jungo Kasai, Yizhong Wang, Yushi Hu, Mari Ostendorf, Wen-tau Yih, Noah A. Smith, Luke Zettlemoyer, Tao Yu

arXiv: 2212.09741v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We introduce INSTRUCTOR, a new method for computing text embeddings given task instructions: every text input is embedded together with instructions explaining the use case (e.g., task and domain descriptions). Unlike encoders from prior work that are more specialized, INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that can generate text embeddings tailored to different downstream tasks and domains, without any further training. We first annotate instructions for 330 diverse tasks and train INSTRUCTOR on this multitask mixture with a contrastive loss. We evaluate INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding evaluation tasks (66 of which are unseen during training), ranging from classification and information retrieval to semantic textual similarity and text generation evaluation. INSTRUCTOR, while having an order of magnitude fewer parameters than the previous best model, achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an average improvement of 3.4% compared to the previous best results on the 70 diverse datasets. Our analysis suggests that INSTRUCTOR is robust to changes in instructions, and that instruction finetuning mitigates the challenge of training a single model on diverse datasets.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Dec. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.09741v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

The paper "One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings" introduces the innovative method of INSTRUCTOR for generating text embeddings based on task instructions. Unlike previous specialized encoders, INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that can produce customized text embeddings for various downstream tasks and domains without additional training. The researchers annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks and trained INSTRUCTOR using a multitask mixture with contrastive loss. The evaluation of INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding tasks covers classification, information retrieval, semantic textual similarity, and text generation evaluations. Despite having fewer parameters than the previous best model, INSTRUCTOR achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average improvement of 3.4% across diverse datasets. The analysis shows that INSTRUCTOR is robust to changes in instructions and that instruction finetuning effectively addresses the challenge of training a single model on varied datasets. Additionally, the paper discusses how INSTRUCTOR performs on classification tasks by using text embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping sentence embeddings frozen. It also explores semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks where the model measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of their embeddings. Furthermore, automatic summarization evaluation methods are discussed in the context of evaluating performance on downstream tasks. Overall, the study showcases the versatility and effectiveness of INSTRUCTOR in generating high-quality text embeddings tailored to different tasks and domains without requiring extensive retraining or specialization.

- INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that generates text embeddings based on task instructions
- Trained using multitask mixture with contrastive loss on annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks
- Achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse datasets with an average improvement of 3.4%
- Robust to changes in instructions and effective in addressing the challenge of training a single model on varied datasets
- Utilizes text embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping sentence embeddings frozen for classification tasks
- Measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of embeddings for semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks
- Discusses automatic summarization evaluation methods in the context of evaluating performance on downstream tasks

Summary- An INSTRUCTOR is like a special helper that understands and follows instructions to do different tasks. - It learns how to do many tasks by practicing with different instructions and gets better at them. - It does really well on different tasks, improving by an average of 3.4% compared to others. - It can handle changes in instructions and is good at working with different types of tasks. - It uses text features for training classifiers but keeps sentence features fixed for sorting tasks. Definitions- **INSTRUCTOR**: A special tool that helps with tasks based on given instructions. - **Embeddings**: Representations of text or data in a way that computers can understand and work with efficiently. - **Multitask mixture**: Learning from multiple tasks at the same time to improve performance. - **Contrastive loss**: A method used during training to make similar things closer together and dissimilar things farther apart in the learning process. - **State-of-the-art performance**: Being among the best or most advanced in terms of results achieved. - **Robust**: Strong and able to withstand changes or challenges effectively. - **Text embeddings**: Representations of text data that capture its meaning or context in a numerical form. - **Classifiers**: Algorithms or models used for sorting or categorizing data into different groups based on certain criteria. - **Cosine similarity**: A measure of similarity between two vectors by calculating the cosine of the angle between them.

Introduction The ability to generate high-quality text embeddings is crucial for natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as classification, information retrieval, semantic textual similarity, and text generation. Text embeddings are numerical representations of words or sentences that capture their semantic and syntactic relationships. They serve as input features for downstream NLP tasks and can significantly impact their performance. Traditionally, specialized encoders have been used to generate task-specific text embeddings. However, these models require extensive training on large datasets and may not generalize well to new domains or tasks. In contrast, the paper "One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings" introduces a novel method called INSTRUCTOR that can produce customized text embeddings for various downstream tasks without additional training. INSTRUCTOR: A Single Embedder for Multiple Tasks INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that can generate task-specific text embeddings by fine-tuning its parameters based on task instructions. The researchers annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks from different domains such as sentiment analysis, question-answering, and machine translation. These instructions provide guidance on how the model should process the input data to generate relevant text embeddings. To train INSTRUCTOR, the researchers used a multitask mixture with contrastive loss where the model learns from multiple tasks simultaneously while minimizing the distance between similar inputs and maximizing it between dissimilar ones. This approach allows INSTRUCTOR to learn generalizable representations that can be tailored to specific tasks through instruction finetuning. Evaluation Results The evaluation of INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding tasks covers classification, information retrieval, semantic textual similarity (STS), and text generation evaluations. The results show that INSTRUCTOR achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average improvement of 3.4% across diverse datasets compared to previous best models. Classification Tasks For classification tasks such as sentiment analysis or topic categorization, INSTRUCTOR uses its generated sentence-level embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping the sentence embeddings frozen. This approach allows INSTRUCTOR to adapt to different classification tasks without retraining, resulting in improved performance compared to specialized encoders. Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) Tasks INSTRUCTOR also performs well on STS tasks where the model measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of their embeddings. The results show that INSTRUCTOR outperforms previous models on STS tasks, demonstrating its ability to capture semantic relationships between sentences. Automatic Summarization Evaluation The paper also discusses how automatic summarization evaluation methods can be used to evaluate INSTRUCTOR's performance on downstream tasks. Automatic summarization involves generating a summary of a longer text, and it is an essential task for many NLP applications such as document summarization or news article generation. By evaluating INSTRUCTOR's performance on automatic summarization tasks, the researchers demonstrate its effectiveness in capturing important information from input texts and generating relevant summaries. Conclusion The paper "One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings" introduces a novel method called INSTRUCTOR for generating task-specific text embeddings based on instructions. The results of the evaluation show that INSTRUCTOR outperforms previous specialized encoders and achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse datasets and tasks. Its ability to generate high-quality text embeddings tailored to specific tasks without extensive retraining makes it a valuable tool for various NLP applications. Future research could explore using larger datasets and more complex instruction annotations to further improve the performance of INSTRUCTOR.

Created on 15 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.