Machine Learning-based Classification of Birds through Birdsong
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the use of audio sound recognition and classification techniques for identifying birds based on their birdsong.
- Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) are used in combination with various machine learning models.
- Different approaches for data processing and augmentation are presented, showcasing the effectiveness of state-of-the-art machine learning models.
- Overall accuracy of 91% is achieved when identifying the top-5 bird species from a selected case study comprising 30 birds.
- Accuracy drops to 58% when applied to more challenging and diverse audio files containing 152 bird species.
- The research demonstrates the potential of using MFCC and machine learning models for bird identification through birdsong analysis.
- Further improvements are needed to enhance performance on more complex datasets.
- The paper provides valuable insights into the application of machine learning in bird classification based on birdsong analysis.
Authors: Yueying Chang, Richard O. Sinnott
Abstract: Audio sound recognition and classification is used for many tasks and applications including human voice recognition, music recognition and audio tagging. In this paper we apply Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) in combination with a range of machine learning models to identify (Australian) birds from publicly available audio files of their birdsong. We present approaches used for data processing and augmentation and compare the results of various state of the art machine learning models. We achieve an overall accuracy of 91% for the top-5 birds from the 30 selected as the case study. Applying the models to more challenging and diverse audio files comprising 152 bird species, we achieve an accuracy of 58%
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.