Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.04329v1

The field of fraud analytics and fraud detection has experienced significant growth in the past decade, resulting in a wide range of research topics and a lack of organization within the discipline. This paper, authored by Christopher Bockel-Rickermann, Tim Verdonck, and Wouter Verbeke, aims to provide an overview of fraud analytics research and establish a more structured framework for the field. The authors analyze nearly 300 records on fraud analytics published between 2011 and 2020, systematically identifying the primary domains of application, challenges faced, performance metrics, and methods used. The focus of academic research in fraud analytics spans from detecting fraudulent credit card payments to identifying illegitimate insurance claims. With such diverse objectives, there is a need for greater organization within the field. To address this issue, the authors propose a framework for fraud analytical methods and suggest a keywording strategy for future research. One major challenge in fraud analytics is accessing public datasets that are suitable for research purposes. In order to assist the research community further, the authors outline eight requirements for appropriate data sets based on their findings. Additionally, they structure their sample of literature into an online database that is accessible to fellow researchers for investigation and potential expansion. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the current state of fraud analytics research while offering solutions to improve organization within the field. By analyzing existing literature and proposing frameworks and strategies for future studies, it contributes to advancing knowledge in this important area of study.

• - Fraud analytics and fraud detection have grown significantly in the past decade, leading to a lack of organization within the field.
• - The paper aims to provide an overview of fraud analytics research and establish a more structured framework for the field.
• - The authors analyzed nearly 300 records on fraud analytics published between 2011 and 2020, identifying domains of application, challenges faced, performance metrics, and methods used.
• - Academic research in fraud analytics covers various objectives, from detecting fraudulent credit card payments to identifying illegitimate insurance claims.
• - The authors propose a framework for fraud analytical methods and suggest a keywording strategy for future research to improve organization within the field.
• - Accessing suitable public datasets is a major challenge in fraud analytics research.
• - The authors outline eight requirements for appropriate data sets based on their findings.
• - They structure their sample of literature into an online database accessible to fellow researchers for investigation and potential expansion.

Fraud analytics and fraud detection means using special tools and methods to find out if someone is doing something dishonest or illegal. A lack of organization means that things are not well-organized or planned in this field, which can make it confusing. Research means studying and learning about a topic by looking at information and data. A framework is like a structure or plan that helps organize things in a clear way. Academic research means studying and learning about something in school or university. Keywords are important words that help us find specific information when we search for something online. Dataset means a collection of information or data that researchers use to study something. Accessible means easy to get to or reach."

Overview of Fraud Analytics Research

The field of fraud analytics and fraud detection has experienced significant growth in the past decade, resulting in a wide range of research topics and a lack of organization within the discipline. To address this issue, Christopher Bockel-Rickermann, Tim Verdonck, and Wouter Verbeke have authored a paper to provide an overview of fraud analytics research and establish a more structured framework for the field.

Analysis of Existing Literature

The authors analyze nearly 300 records on fraud analytics published between 2011 and 2020, systematically identifying the primary domains of application, challenges faced, performance metrics, and methods used. The focus of academic research in fraud analytics spans from detecting fraudulent credit card payments to identifying illegitimate insurance claims.

Proposed Framework for Fraud Analytical Methods

With such diverse objectives in mind, there is a need for greater organization within the field. To address this issue, the authors propose a framework for fraud analytical methods that can be used as guidance when conducting future studies. They also suggest a keywording strategy to facilitate better searchability when looking up related literature.

Requirements for Appropriate Data Sets

One major challenge in fraud analytics is accessing public datasets that are suitable for research purposes. In order to assist the research community further, the authors outline eight requirements based on their findings which should be taken into consideration when selecting data sets: accuracy; completeness; consistency; availability; scalability; privacy protection measures; usability; and timeliness.

Online Database Accessible to Researchers

Additionally, they structure their sample of literature into an online database that is accessible to fellow researchers for investigation and potential expansion. This provides valuable insights into current trends while allowing researchers to easily access relevant information without having to manually search through hundreds of papers or articles themselves.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the current state of fraud analytics research while offering solutions to improve organization within the field. By analyzing existing literature and proposing frameworks and strategies for future studies it contributes significantly towards advancing knowledge in this important area of study