Fault-tolerant Post-Selection for Low Overhead Magic State Preparation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors introduce a novel framework for fault-tolerant post-selection (FTPS) of fault-tolerant codes and channels
- Framework uses soft-information metrics based on visible syndrome and erasure information to enhance quality of surface code magic states with minimal overhead
- Logical gap is a powerful soft-information metric for predicting logical error rates in fault-tolerant channels using topological error-correcting codes
- FTPS framework leveraged to reduce encoding error rate of magic state preparation channels to match physical error rate with low overhead
- Operating at 60% of bulk threshold of surface code allows for significant reduction in encoding error rate by a factor of 15, with relative overhead factor less than 2
- Analysis of schematic buffer architecture for implementing post-selection rules in magic state factories within context of magic state distillation
- Framework can be extended to mitigate errors in more general fault-tolerant logical channels, showcasing versatility and potential impact across various quantum computing applications
Authors: Héctor Bombín, Mihir Pant, Sam Roberts, Karthik I. Seetharam
Abstract: We introduce a framework for fault-tolerant post-selection (FTPS) of fault-tolerant codes and channels -- such as those based on surface-codes -- using soft-information metrics based on visible syndrome and erasure information. We introduce several metrics for ranking configurations of syndromes and erasures. In particular, we introduce the \emph{logical gap} (and variants thereof) as a powerful soft-information metric for predicting logical error rates of fault-tolerant channels based on topological error-correcting codes. The logical gap is roughly the unsigned weight difference between inequivalent logical corrections and is adaptable to any tailored noise model or decoder. We deploy this framework to prepare high-quality surface code magic states with low overhead under a model of independent and identically distributed (\emph{i.i.d.}) Pauli and erasure errors. Post-selection strategies based on the logical gap can suppress the encoding error rate of a magic state preparation channel to the level of the physical error rate with low overhead. For example, when operating at $60\%$ the bulk threshold of the corresponding surface code, an overall reduction of the encoding error rate by a factor of $15$ is achievable with a relative overhead factor of ${< 2}$ (approximately $23$ times less than that of simple syndrome-counting rules). We analyze a schematic buffer architecture for implementing post-selection rules on magic state factories in the context of magic state distillation. The FTPS framework can be utilized for mitigating errors in more general fault-tolerant logical channels.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.