Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Galaxy Morphology in the Green Valley, Prominent rings and looser Spiral Arms

AI-generated keywords: Green Valley Galaxy Morphology Galaxy Zoo GAMA Fields Disc Galaxies

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on the morphology of galaxies in the "green valley"
  • Utilizes Galaxy And Mass Assembly database and citizen science morphological estimates from Galaxy Zoo
  • Goal is to understand what brings galaxies into the green valley and examine their unique characteristics
  • Previous studies suggest disc features, such as rings and lenses, are more commonly found in green valley galaxies
  • Authors analyze dataset of galaxies with morphology labels provided by Galaxy Zoo for GAMA fields based on new KiDS images
  • Findings confirm that ring structures are more frequently observed in green valley galaxies compared to red and blue counterparts
  • Ring structures are a consequence of disc galaxies in the green valley actively exhibiting fading discs and evolving disc morphology
  • Correlation between progression from blue to red colors and loosening spiral arm structure
  • Study provides insights into structural differences within green valley galaxies and their transitional nature between active star formation and quiescence
  • Highlights value of involving non-experts in large-scale morphological analyses of galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dominic Smith (University of Louisville), Lutz Haberzettl (University of Louisville), L. E. Porter (University of Louisville), Ren Porter-Temple (University of Louisville), Christopher P. A. Henry (University of Louisville), Benne Holwerda (University of Louisville), A. R. Lopez-Sanchez (Macquarie University), Steven Phillipps (University of Bristol), Alister W. Graham (Swinburne), Sarah Brough (New South Wales), Kevin A. Pimbblet (University of Hull), Jochen Liske (Hamburger Sternwarte), Lee S. Kelvin (Princeton), Clayton D. Robertson (UofL), Wade Roemer (UofL), Michael Walmsley (Jodrell Bank), David O'Ryan (Lancaster University), Tobias Geron (Oxford University)

arXiv: 2211.08355v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
11 pages, 21 figures, accepted to MNRAS

Abstract: Galaxies broadly fall into two categories: star-forming (blue) galaxies and quiescent (red) galaxies. In between, one finds the less populated ``green valley". Some of these galaxies are suspected to be in the process of ceasing their star-formation through a gradual exhaustion of gas supply or already dead and are experiencing a rejuvenation of star-formation through fuel injection. We use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly database and the Galaxy Zoo citizen science morphological estimates to compare the morphology of galaxies in the green valley against those in the red sequence and blue cloud. Our goal is to examine the structural differences within galaxies that fall in the green valley, and what brings them there. Previous results found disc features such as rings and lenses are more prominently represented in the green valley population. We revisit this with a similar sized data set of galaxies with morphology labels provided by the Galaxy Zoo for the GAMA fields based on new KiDS images. Our aim is to compare qualitatively the results from expert classification to that of citizen science. We observe that ring structures are indeed found more commonly in green valley galaxies compared to their red and blue counterparts. We suggest that ring structures are a consequence of disc galaxies in the green valley actively exhibiting characteristics of fading discs and evolving disc morphology of galaxies. We note that the progression from blue to red correlates with loosening spiral arm structure.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.08355v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study focuses on the morphology of galaxies in the "green valley," which is a less populated region between star-forming (blue) galaxies and quiescent (red) galaxies. The researchers utilize the Galaxy And Mass Assembly database and citizen science morphological estimates from the Galaxy Zoo to compare the structural differences within green valley galaxies against those in the red sequence and blue cloud. The goal of this research is to understand what brings galaxies into the green valley and examine their unique characteristics. Previous studies have suggested that disc features, such as rings and lenses, are more commonly found in green valley galaxies. To further investigate this, the authors analyze a similar-sized dataset of galaxies with morphology labels provided by the Galaxy Zoo for the GAMA fields based on new KiDS images. They aim to compare these results from expert classification to those obtained through citizen science. The findings confirm that ring structures are indeed more frequently observed in green valley galaxies compared to their red and blue counterparts. The researchers propose that these ring structures are a consequence of disc galaxies in the green valley actively exhibiting fading discs and evolving disc morphology. Additionally, they note that there is a correlation between the progression from blue to red colors and a loosening spiral arm structure. Overall, this study provides further insights into the structural differences within green valley galaxies and sheds light on their transitional nature between active star formation and quiescence. By comparing expert classification with citizen science results, it highlights the value of involving non-experts in large-scale morphological analyses of galaxies.
Created on 14 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.