Towards reliable calcification detection: calibration of uncertainty in coronary optical coherence tomography images

AI-generated keywords: Medical imaging

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is crucial in managing coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) relies on image-guided solutions for CAD treatment
  • Accurate object detection is essential for identifying calcifications in arteries before treatment
  • Deep learning-based object detection methods, such as You-Only-Look-Once v5 (YOLO), are used for detecting calcifications in coronary OCT images
  • Calibrated confidence scores improve reliability of predictions and enhance clinical evaluations during CAD treatment
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hongshan Liu, Xueshen Li, Abdul Latif Bamba, Xiaoyu Song, Brigitta C. Brott, Silvio H. Litovsky, Yu Gan

Abstract: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become increasingly essential in assisting the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Image-guided solutions such as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are extensively used during the treatment of CAD. However, unidentified calcified regions within a narrowed artery could impair the outcome of the PCI. Prior to treatments, object detection is paramount to automatically procure accurate readings on the location and thickness of calcifications within the artery. Deep learning-based object detection methods have been explored in a variety of applications. The quality of object detection predictions could lead to uncertain results, which are not desirable in safety-critical scenarios. In this work, we implement an object detection model, You-Only-Look-Once v5 (YOLO), on a calcification detection framework within coronary OCT images. We evaluate the uncertainty of predictions based on the expected calibration errors, thus assessing the certainty level of detection results. To calibrate confidence scores of predictions, we implement dependent logistic calibration using each detection result's confidence and center coordinates. With the calibrated confidence score of each prediction, we lower the uncertainty of predictions in calcification detection. Our results show that the YOLO achieves higher precision and recall in comparison with the other object detection model, meanwhile producing more reliable results. The calibrated confidence of prediction results in a confidence error of approximately 0.13, suggesting that the confidence calibration on calcification detection could provide a more trustworthy result, indicating a great potential to assist clinical evaluation of treating the CAD during the imaging-guided procedure.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.06728v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the field of medical imaging, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has emerged as a crucial tool in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), a common procedure used in CAD treatment, relies heavily on image-guided solutions to navigate through narrowed arteries. However, the presence of unidentified calcified regions within these arteries can pose challenges and potentially impact the success of PCI outcomes. To address this issue, accurate object detection is essential for identifying the location and thickness of calcifications prior to treatment. Deep learning-based object detection methods have been increasingly explored across various applications, including medical imaging. The quality of object detection predictions plays a critical role in ensuring reliable results, particularly in safety-critical scenarios such as CAD treatment. In this study, researchers implemented the You-Only-Look-Once v5 (YOLO) object detection model within a framework designed specifically for detecting calcifications in coronary OCT images. One key aspect addressed in this research is the evaluation of uncertainty in prediction results. By assessing expected calibration errors, researchers were able to determine the certainty level of detection outcomes. To enhance the reliability of predictions, confidence scores were calibrated using dependent logistic calibration based on each detection result's confidence and center coordinates. This approach aimed to reduce uncertainty in calcification detection and improve the overall accuracy of results. The findings revealed that YOLO demonstrated higher precision and recall compared to other object detection models while producing more reliable outcomes. Through calibrated confidence scores, researchers achieved a confidence error rate of approximately 0.13, indicating improved trustworthiness in prediction results. This calibration process holds significant potential for enhancing clinical evaluations during CAD treatment procedures guided by imaging techniques. Authors involved in this study include Hongshan Liu, Xueshen Li, Abdul Latif Bamba, Xiaoyu Song, Brigitta C. Brott, Silvio H. Litovsky, and Yu Gan. The research paper is published under DOI 10.1117/1.JBO.28.3.036008 and provides valuable insights into refining calcification detection methods within coronary OCT imaging for improved clinical decision-making in CAD management scenarios.
Created on 19 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.