Group Testing with Side Information via Generalized Approximate Message Passing
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Group testing is a method used in widespread testing programs during pandemics.
- The authors propose incorporating side information (SI) from contact tracing (CT) into group testing algorithms.
- They use generalized approximate message passing (GAMP) to integrate CT SI data into the group testing framework.
- GAMP-based algorithms demonstrate improved accuracy compared to a loopy belief propagation algorithm.
- Numerical results show that using GAMP-based algorithms increases the success probability by 0.25 compared to the loopy belief propagation algorithm.
- This research highlights the potential benefits of incorporating CT SI into group testing algorithms for more accurate identification of infected individuals.
- Utilizing generalized approximate message passing can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of widespread testing programs during pandemics.
Authors: Shu-Jie Cao, Ritesh Goenka, Chau-Wai Wong, Ajit Rajwade, Dror Baron
Abstract: Group testing can help maintain a widespread testing program using fewer resources amid a pandemic. In a group testing setup, we are given n samples, one per individual. Each individual is either infected or uninfected. These samples are arranged into m < n pooled samples, where each pool is obtained by mixing a subset of the n individual samples. Infected individuals are then identified using a group testing algorithm. In this paper, we incorporate side information (SI) collected from contact tracing (CT) into nonadaptive/single-stage group testing algorithms. We generate different types of possible CT SI data by incorporating different possible characteristics of the spread of the disease. These data are fed into a group testing framework based on generalized approximate message passing (GAMP). Numerical results show that our GAMP-based algorithms provide improved accuracy. Compared to a loopy belief propagation algorithm, our proposed framework can increase the success probability by 0.25 for a group testing problem of n = 500 individuals with m = 100 pooled samples.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.