Rickrolling the Artist: Injecting Invisible Backdoors into Text-Guided Image Generation Models

AI-generated keywords: Backdoor Attacks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address security concerns surrounding text-to-image synthesis models
  • Many models rely on pre-trained text encoders from external sources
  • Trust in these models may be misplaced
  • Backdoor attacks can be introduced to manipulate image generation
  • Inserting a single non-Latin character can trigger the model to generate images with predefined attributes or follow a hidden and potentially malicious description
  • Empirical demonstration of high effectiveness of these attacks on Stable Diffusion
  • Injecting a single backdoor takes less than two minutes
  • Approach can enhance image generation safety by forcing encoders to forget phrases related to certain concepts such as nudity or violence
  • Research highlights vulnerabilities and the need for improved security measures in text-guided generative models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lukas Struppek, Dominik Hintersdorf, Kristian Kersting

25 pages, 16 figures, 5 tables

Abstract: While text-to-image synthesis currently enjoys great popularity among researchers and the general public, the security of these models has been neglected so far. Many text-guided image generation models rely on pre-trained text encoders from external sources, and their users trust that the retrieved models will behave as promised. Unfortunately, this might not be the case. We introduce backdoor attacks against text-guided generative models and demonstrate that their text encoders pose a major tampering risk. Our attacks only slightly alter an encoder so that no suspicious model behavior is apparent for image generations with clean prompts. By then inserting a single non-Latin character into the prompt, the adversary can trigger the model to either generate images with pre-defined attributes or images following a hidden, potentially malicious description. We empirically demonstrate the high effectiveness of our attacks on Stable Diffusion and highlight that the injection process of a single backdoor takes less than two minutes. Besides phrasing our approach solely as an attack, it can also force an encoder to forget phrases related to certain concepts, such as nudity or violence, and help to make image generation safer.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.02408v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Rickrolling the Artist: Injecting Invisible Backdoors into Text-Guided Image Generation Models," authors Lukas Struppek, Dominik Hintersdorf, and Kristian Kersting address the security concerns surrounding text-to-image synthesis models. While these models have gained popularity among researchers and the general public, their security has been largely neglected. Many text-guided image generation models rely on pre-trained text encoders from external sources, and users trust that these models will behave as expected. However, the authors demonstrate that this trust may be misplaced. They introduce backdoor attacks against text-guided generative models and highlight the significant tampering risk posed by their text encoders. The attacks described in the paper involve making slight alterations to an encoder so that no suspicious behavior is apparent when generating images with clean prompts. However, by inserting a single non-Latin character into the prompt, an adversary can trigger the model to generate images with predefined attributes or follow a hidden and potentially malicious description. To validate their claims, the authors empirically demonstrate the high effectiveness of these attacks on Stable Diffusion. They also emphasize that injecting a single backdoor takes less than two minutes. Importantly, they note that their approach can not only be framed as an attack but also as a means to force an encoder to forget phrases related to certain concepts such as nudity or violence, thereby enhancing image generation safety. Overall, this research sheds light on potential vulnerabilities of text-guided generative models and highlights the need for improved security measures in this field. By raising awareness about backdoor attacks and proposing potential solutions such as forcing encoders to forget certain concepts, this study contributes to making image generation safer in practice.
Created on 20 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.