SLOT-V: Supervised Learning of Observer Models for Legible Robot Motion Planning in Manipulation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper introduces SLOT-V, a supervised learning framework for training observer models in legible robot motion planning.
- Legibility refers to how easily a human observer can understand the goal of a robot based on its motion trajectory.
- Existing planners often rely on hand-crafted or demonstration-based observer models.
- SLOT-V proposes learning these observer models in a supervised manner using the same data format commonly used for evaluating existing approaches.
- SLOT-V can accurately predict various hand-crafted observer models, indicating its hypothesis space encompasses existing models.
- SLOT-V's performance remains good in environments with unseen goal configurations and/or goal counts, highlighting its generalization ability.
- Compared to an existing Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) approach, SLOT-V learns better observer models with less data, suggesting superior sample efficiency.
- SLOT-V is capable of learning viable observer models that lead to more legible trajectories.
- Improved legibility has the potential to enhance human-robot interaction by facilitating better understanding and transparency between humans and robots.
Authors: Sebastian Wallkotter, Mohamed Chetouani, Ginevra Castellano
Abstract: We present SLOT-V, a novel supervised learning framework that learns observer models (human preferences) from robot motion trajectories in a legibility context. Legibility measures how easily a (human) observer can infer the robot's goal from a robot motion trajectory. When generating such trajectories, existing planners often rely on an observer model that estimates the quality of trajectory candidates. These observer models are frequently hand-crafted or, occasionally, learned from demonstrations. Here, we propose to learn them in a supervised manner using the same data format that is frequently used during the evaluation of aforementioned approaches. We then demonstrate the generality of SLOT-V using a Franka Emika in a simulated manipulation environment. For this, we show that it can learn to closely predict various hand-crafted observer models, i.e., that SLOT-V's hypothesis space encompasses existing handcrafted models. Next, we showcase SLOT-V's ability to generalize by showing that a trained model continues to perform well in environments with unseen goal configurations and/or goal counts. Finally, we benchmark SLOT-V's sample efficiency (and performance) against an existing IRL approach and show that SLOT-V learns better observer models with less data. Combined, these results suggest that SLOT-V can learn viable observer models. Better observer models imply more legible trajectories, which may - in turn - lead to better and more transparent human-robot interaction.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.