Hebbian Deep Learning Without Feedback
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors address limitations of backpropagation (BP) in neural network training
- Proposed approach called multilayer SoftHebb overcomes challenges without feedback, target, or error signals
- SoftHebb leverages Hebbian learning principles in soft winner-take-all networks
- Eliminates weight transport, non-local plasticity, time-locking of layer updates, iterative equilibria, and supervisory feedback signals for efficiency
- Maintains high accuracy levels while enhancing efficiency and biological plausibility
- Demonstrates superior performance on popular datasets like MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10, and ImageNet
- Achieves accuracies reaching 99.4%, 80.3%, 76.2%, and 27.3% respectively with up to five hidden layers and a linear classifier
- Challenges conventional wisdom by showcasing that a few layers may be sufficient for effective neural network training
- Represents a paradigm shift from traditional backpropagation methods towards more biologically inspired and accurate alternatives
Authors: Adrien Journé, Hector Garcia Rodriguez, Qinghai Guo, Timoleon Moraitis
Abstract: Recent approximations to backpropagation (BP) have mitigated many of BP's computational inefficiencies and incompatibilities with biology, but important limitations still remain. Moreover, the approximations significantly decrease accuracy in benchmarks, suggesting that an entirely different approach may be more fruitful. Here, grounded on recent theory for Hebbian learning in soft winner-take-all networks, we present multilayer SoftHebb, i.e. an algorithm that trains deep neural networks, without any feedback, target, or error signals. As a result, it achieves efficiency by avoiding weight transport, non-local plasticity, time-locking of layer updates, iterative equilibria, and (self-) supervisory or other feedback signals -- which were necessary in other approaches. Its increased efficiency and biological compatibility do not trade off accuracy compared to state-of-the-art bio-plausible learning, but rather improve it. With up to five hidden layers and an added linear classifier, accuracies on MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10, and ImageNet, respectively reach 99.4%, 80.3%, 76.2%, and 27.3%. In conclusion, SoftHebb shows with a radically different approach from BP that Deep Learning over few layers may be plausible in the brain and increases the accuracy of bio-plausible machine learning.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.